Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

penguindev OP t1_j403qde wrote

source data: https://mortality.org/Data/STMF

  • Excluded RUS and TWN because they were not up to latest year
  • Men are blue, women are pink. Astonishing how much more men die younger :| (It reverses in the higher ages)
  • Note: source data is a little sketch because each country has their own age brackets, which don't necessarily line up to 0-64, but I felt that involved the least data munging. (If you read the metadata docs on their site it says this.) I am just taking the data that they claim is 0-64, FYI.
  • I give up trying to paste my code as a code block here. Screw reddit.
2

Malalang t1_j404yi4 wrote

So, when do the rest of the women die?

4

irkli t1_j4054v6 wrote

I am 67. I HAVE ESCAPED DEATH! YAY!

5

Myrcello_Stone t1_j405ot9 wrote

We are genderfluid. If you want to be woke you just show one number and mix pink with blue.

You get then a light brown representing the world we live in today.

Hehe

−3

eric5014 t1_j405w9q wrote

Is the lower spot in the last quarter due to incomplete data?

You can see some countries get hit harder by Covid.

1

alexilas t1_j4079nu wrote

And of course USA had to bear everyone at that too

1

penguindev OP t1_j407gu8 wrote

Replying to eric5014 (#1,339,180)

Yeah, there are a lot of delays, provisional data, etc.... it's not real time by any stretch of the imagination, according to each country's systems. I just left the data as is.

As you said, I think it's enough to see some interesting trends. But it's not as good as looking at a smaller age band in a smaller area with more consistent data collection rules.

1

Wlng-Man t1_j40ngz9 wrote

"Death by Sex" is what we all strife for!

3

LanewayRat t1_j40sdwy wrote

This is terrible. The worst things are.

  1. The scales are all different. Why not make it per capita?
  2. Half the country names are indecipherable. Why not use normal English descriptions? Wtf is “fratnp” or “isr”?
3

cavedave t1_j40y10b wrote

Replying to penguindev (#1,339,087)

Could you say what programming language you used? I need it in the comment above to approve the post

I approved it anyway. It's a good post. But please comment the tool used above.

1

xxthundergodxx77 t1_j410cen wrote

Replying to LanewayRat (#1,340,106)

I kinda agree on the second part but not everyone is American and fratnp seems to be normal. The scales are different because the point of the graph is just to show total deaths quarterly, not really compare them all visually or make a point

1

LanewayRat t1_j411nqq wrote

Replying to xxthundergodxx77 (#1,340,455)

No point? All these graphs presented together for no reason? Not to allow comparisons? Just a random assemblage of unrelated data?

What has “American” got to do with understanding “fratnp” or “grebntw”? What country are you from and what language or codified standard is this? Does the whole world understand it and not this poor ignorant Australian?

1

xxthundergodxx77 t1_j412a5v wrote

Replying to LanewayRat (#1,340,527)

I personally found it interesting regardless. Especially seeing the spikes for that one specific quarter.

I don't know where it's used specifically but it seems to be a lot of statistic pages use fratnp for France and grebntw for England and Wales

1

ZetaZeta t1_j43vjnj wrote

Doesn't sound like a bad way to go. You know...

Death by sex.

1