Submitted by theggman_ t3_10532eh in dataisbeautiful
Comments
theggman_ OP t1_j3bd3vk wrote
jakubkonecki t1_j3bebw8 wrote
Dude, I can't see it at all. Clicking on your link takes me to "Wow, so empty" page.
theggman_ OP t1_j3bgfnv wrote
wtf, this is wierd
theggman_ OP t1_j3bgrqp wrote
i've reposted the comment and deleted the original lmk if you see it now
jakubkonecki t1_j3bgy02 wrote
Nope. I can only see 4 top-level comments, including mine.
theggman_ OP t1_j3bniya wrote
im confused, wtf
jakubkonecki t1_j3bo8o5 wrote
Have you actually posted the comment? Or is it just sitting as a draft on your device?
theggman_ OP t1_j3bono0 wrote
nono i've posted it, mods haven't removed my post so im assuming some people can see it. Still, i can't see it in incognito mode, im getting even more confused.
jakubkonecki t1_j3boxfu wrote
If no-one but you can see your comment, is it really posted? Do you hear voices as well ;-)?
Don't worry, enjoy your weekend!
theggman_ OP t1_j3bt0e5 wrote
lmao, enjoy your weekend too
HankRivera t1_j39ko5y wrote
Ketamine is safer if you drink green tea before use to minimize kidney/bladder damage.
theggman_ OP t1_j3a05h2 wrote
cool, i mean it already seems pretty safe
dsafklj t1_j3btr63 wrote
It's a bit odd to talk about the Therapeutic Index of something like ethanol. AFAIK ethanol isn't really used to treat anything (except perhaps ethanol addiction withdrawal or maybe some type of poisoning) so what's a 'effective treatment dose' (numerator of Therapeutic Index) of ethanol even mean? Feeling tipsy? buzzed? Wasted?
Also would have been interesting to include some medications with relatively narrow Therapeutic Indices. Acetaminophen/Tylenol and Warfarin/Coumadin come to mind as widely used medications with quite narrow Therapeutic Indices.
theggman_ OP t1_j3buezd wrote
in this case i estimated the ED50 as getting high (not dunk off your mind, just enough to see significant activity), i know there are other drugs that have narrow therapeutic indexes but this was intended to be a review of commonly used recreational substances
Head__Honcho t1_j39i6ly wrote
Is ethanol basically just all alcohol?
eddy_talon t1_j3a2jvc wrote
Yes. Ethanol is a flammable, colorless, slightly toxic chemical compound, and is best known as the alcohol found in alcoholic beverages. In common usage, it is often referred to simply as alcohol.
[deleted] t1_j39kgr1 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j39zmmb wrote
[removed]
theggman_ OP t1_j3bvam0 wrote
reddit seems to delete my comments with sources and explanation, im going crazy
[deleted] t1_j3bvbfy wrote
[removed]
theggman_ OP t1_j3bvgyb wrote
this are the sources: pdfhost dot io/v/Tdx47N5.G_TI_of_various_drugs
lbs21 t1_j3cl3bg wrote
Thanks for posting the source. Weird that you're having trouble posting links, though. Regardless, I was hoping you might be able to help me find the info inside of a source. I was surprised to see that the TI of fentanyl was 7x that of alcohol (given the fear mongering), and I couldn't find the ED-50 on the DEA's website. It's possible I missed it - could you identify the paragraph on the DEA's website that talks about the ED-50 of fentanyl? I'm kind of surprised they'd give out that info, to be honest.
I noticed that the ED-50 of fentanyl was italicized - does that mean it is perhaps not listed in the source provided?
theggman_ OP t1_j3cmu34 wrote
oh yeah i forgot to add, i have taken most of the active doses from psychonaut wiki.
Whilst it is obviously not a reputable source, they usually have pretty accurate information and finding reputable source for recreational doses is pretty hard
lbs21 t1_j3clqmk wrote
I thought this might be it, but it doesn't match the data - FDA says fentanyl is about 100x more potent than morphene. Assuming this matches the ED (a big assumption), the ED of fentanyl would be .0024 mg/kg (or 1/100th of morphene), and the TI to be 1.25. But such a low TI can't be right... can it?
[deleted] t1_j38gbe3 wrote
[removed]
Yahallo139 t1_j3ak89h wrote
Caffaine is less harmful than LSD?
Otherwise-Lime-9148 t1_j3bad8b wrote
More (Less is Worse)
theggman_ OP t1_j3bde5u wrote
it's easier to overdose on it (it's still incredibly hard)
edit: i've read your comment wrong lol, you can overdose more easily on caffeine, lsd is completely bodily safe.
[deleted] t1_j3bq4vp wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3amdhn wrote
[removed]
theggman_ OP t1_j3bgp87 wrote
What is a therapeutic index (TI for short):
TI is a way of gauging a substance toxicity. It can be calculated in two different ways:
- LD50 / ED50
- TD50 / ED50
LD50: lethal dose in 50% of the test population
ED50: dose to achieve desired effects (in this case experiencing pyschoactivity) in 50% of the test population
TD50: dose to experience toxic effect in 50% of the test population
​
In this case all the values are calculated using the first method.
Keep in mind that the substances used are pure and in a lab environment.
Addressing inaccuracies:
As you might imagine calculating the TI of a given substance for humans is pretty hard, this data is based on animal studies and estimates based on death reports, so it might not be incredibly accurate. Also the therapeutic index calculated this way doen't directly measure how toxic a substance is for your body, although a broad therapeutic index generally implies a less toxic substance.
(?): since it's unknown if these substances can cause death in humans it's really hard to calculate their TI
(*): LD50 are all over the place for this substances, this is the best i could find.
Sources: https://pdfhost.io/v/Tdx47N5.G_TI_of_various_drugs
Tool: google sheets
if you find more accurate sources please link them in the comment's
edit: some clarifications
[deleted] t1_j3bp9vm wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3bpwvf wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3bpzvv wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3bq497 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3bq85n wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3bt4v9 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3bv0ai wrote
[removed]
theggman_ OP t1_j3bvnqq wrote
What is a therapeutic index (TI for short):
TI is a way of gauging a substance toxicity. It can be calculated in two different ways:
- LD50 / ED50
- TD50 / ED50
LD50: lethal dose in 50% of the test population
ED50: dose to achieve desired effects (in this case experiencing pyschoactivity) in 50% of the test population
TD50: dose to experience toxic effect in 50% of the test population
​
In this case all the values are calculated using the first method.
Keep in mind that the substances used are pure and in a lab environment.
Addressing inaccuracies:
As you might imagine calculating the TI of a given substance for humans is pretty hard, this data is based on animal studies and estimates based on death reports, so it might not be incredibly accurate. Also the therapeutic index calculated this way doen't directly measure how toxic a substance is for your body, although a broad therapeutic index generally implies a less toxic substance.
(?): since it's unknown if these substances can cause death in humans it's really hard to calculate their TI
(*): LD50 are all over the place for this substances, this is the best i could find.
Sources: pdfhost [dot] io/v/Tdx47N5.G_TI_of_various_drugs
Tool: google sheets
if you find more accurate sources please link them in the comment's
edit: some clarifications
jakubkonecki t1_j3b7sv8 wrote
Since the OP haven't provided sources and explanations in the comments, here we go:
Therapeutic index isn't the same as toxicity. It describes how easy it is to 'overdose' and and used to measure how safe a drug is in terms of dosage.
What is doesn't describe is how much damage a drug can make to a body, how severe side-effects may be or how quickly you can become dependent on the drug.