No. This has been lambasted on social media for the horrible axis on the first graph. There's no reason to have two axis on one graph like that, unless you're intentionally trying to be disingenuous.

>There's no reason to have two axis on one graph like that, unless you're intentionally trying to be disingenuous.

Not completely true -- it's somewhat common to have two vertical axes in a graph that's trying to show a correlation between two charts. However, when those axes are showing the same unit, then yes, it does seem like it would be intentionally misleading. This graph in particular was justifiably criticized for its misleading nature.

What figure are we supposed to be looking at? And what makes them beautiful, it's just the most simple line plot there could be.

disagree, it's not beautiful. Plotting curves with different ranges is very misleading (in first plot). This would be a good example of how NOT to present data.

The fact that there is technically a secret word somewhere in the legend, that allows someone to be able to decipher it, doesn't negate that the plot is poorly presented. No one should have to make the effort to go searching to understand the presentation.

>However, when those axes are showing the same unit, then yes, it does seem like it would be intentionally misleading.

This. I have no idea why someone would show the same unit. I've seen this when units are different, but there's really no use case for two axes when they have the same unit.

The typo in the post heading is killing the vibe

Feel like I'm smelling toast

Falls why can't you edit that shit