Submitted by MCgamingMC t3_10m76k1 in dataisbeautiful
HungryLikeTheWolf99 t1_j61m2xa wrote
Reply to comment by st4n13l in Energy consumption in the US from 1776-2014 by MCgamingMC
Yeah, that's what we do. We take standing dead trees, trees that have fallen within the last year, or trees that people are taking out anyway that wouldn't be used for anything.
And I'd never claim it's highly scalable, but if one has the ability, it's a heck of a lot better than just burning nattyG.
st4n13l t1_j61msgp wrote
Yeah I wasn't arguing with you. Just pointing it out for others that this isn't some simple solution we've overlooked. Absolutely agree that if it is an option it's better than fossil fuels.
[deleted] t1_j61ms7u wrote
[deleted]
HungryLikeTheWolf99 t1_j61r5an wrote
Mmmmm no, you're going nuts, bot.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments