skyecolin22 t1_j2n5p5f wrote
It's interesting that your second tracked burrito ever was the heaviest, with another abnormally heavy one following soon after. Did you change measurement methods (different scale, etc) or did those just happen to be heavy burritos right at the beginning?
Flat-Product-119 t1_j2ndyq7 wrote
Most burrito dealers do that the first couple times to get you hooked.
giddyeelreturns t1_j2o3lz7 wrote
It’s true. I once told a kebab guy it was my first ever and he loaded up a monster of a meal for me in one wrap. Nothings ever come close and I’ve been chasing that high since.
HardCounter t1_j2qaknq wrote
I still have dreams of my first gyro. I thought i hated lamb. Not this lamb.
I had a serious debate about how sick was too sick to be worth a second meal.
Acrobatic-Bed-7382 t1_j2o8xn5 wrote
The first one's always free too.
[deleted] t1_j2p7od7 wrote
[removed]
pipboyover9000 t1_j2nt9n0 wrote
In all seriousness, there is no logical connection between the second burrito being weighed as the highest and your hypothesis
There is outlier data that matches the initially high data points in the latter half of the set, that if normalized by a moving average would be identical in value
Finny_b t1_j2o81k7 wrote
The real connection is that having a massive burrito on your 2nd ever trip to a place may trigger or encourage tracking of the weights of burritos. Op may have been intreagued by the varience in weights, perhaps hoping next time or one day they'll get a bigger burrito, only to chase that high or PR for the remainder of the experiment.
zvug t1_j2s2u6c wrote
If the second one is what triggered it, then the first one we’d have data for would be that one (or the third).
The fact that we have data for the first seems to imply that isn’t the case.
pipboyover9000 t1_j2qtg5t wrote
That is definitely plausible imo
SunnyDayInPoland t1_j2nws3s wrote
The staff clocked him weighing it the first time so made a big one next time
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments