Submitted by MrMike t3_zq6ayd in dataisbeautiful
st4n13l t1_j0wyedi wrote
Reply to comment by haz3lnut in Chart: What's the top source of electricity in your state? by MrMike
Every other source of power generation can be neutralized as well
haz3lnut t1_j0wz1r0 wrote
Who is talking about neutralization? It's a nuclear bomb in your backyard.
st4n13l t1_j0wzip7 wrote
Creating a nuclear disaster in another country is the same as dropping a nuclear bomb. Considering Russia has plenty of them, not having nuclear energy doesn't prevent this type of disaster but certainly hamstrings your ability to produce clean energy.
haz3lnut t1_j0wzv2f wrote
Your logic is an example of how mind fucked you are.
Nuclear fission = bad. It needs to stop.
st4n13l t1_j0x1bea wrote
Excellent rebuttal
haz3lnut t1_j0x1qeh wrote
There is nothing clean about nuclear fission. You cannot ignore the waste, which no one has figured out how to deal with it. It's piling up in tons with no solution.
snowfoxsean t1_j0x2f1t wrote
Nuclear waste is much easier to deal with than carbon waste, actually. There's just so much carbon waste and it goes up in the air.
haz3lnut t1_j0x2o36 wrote
Do tell. I'm looking forward to learning how you would deal with nuclear waste.
snowfoxsean t1_j0x2ygy wrote
The most obvious way is to bury it deep underground. The next best way is just to store it for now. Either way it's not that big of a deal to manage, because there just isn't that much of it.
juridiculous t1_j0x1ft0 wrote
Nah we need more of it, if anything!
haz3lnut t1_j0x1vs4 wrote
We are sooo fucked.
Artistic-Boss2665 t1_j0zciie wrote
If we get rid of nuclear, yes
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments