Submitted by malxredleader t3_zxs8k3 in dataisbeautiful
SerialPhilanderer t1_j22zlx0 wrote
Reply to comment by anonkitty2 in [OC] The Number of Endangered Species in Each US State by malxredleader
Well 3:
- Help endangered species thrive
- Kill off stuff that's endangered
- Don't actually look for at risk species in the first place
commanderquill t1_j23e5y2 wrote
They meant that you can lower the number of endangered species in your state by helping them recover or by letting them die out. Either option will decrease the number of species on the endangered list.
Mike2220 t1_j23ggxy wrote
Well, they did have a point with what they were saying, if they have an inaccurate count from under reporting, it's going to skew lower, and say there's a fewer amount of endangered species
Like how one method people employed of lower confirmed covid cases was to not test. Can't have confirmed cases if you don't test, though it does nothing to the actual amount of covid cases.
CrustyMilkCap t1_j24lrxn wrote
Well here's a 4th: Move the goal posts
anonkitty2 t1_j27hu0l wrote
You mean "change the definitions."
anonkitty2 t1_j27hmvw wrote
Failing to look won't remove species that are already being counted.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments