Submitted by PieChartPirate t3_ziwu4m in dataisbeautiful
supermopman t1_iztblth wrote
This would be better with 10 columns and the y-axis could start with decades, ex. 1970, 1980, etc.
Master_of_Rodentia t1_izu1l5q wrote
Yeah. Since it was 12 I started out thinking these were months of select years.
Several_Donkey47 t1_izuc9xw wrote
Same it seems like average temps in the month that is selected but each subsequent block is the year afterwards
HippieInDisguise2_0 t1_izuq9qd wrote
Same I was like "why random years? It seems this could be cherry picked"
navicitizen t1_izw4onn wrote
It is a pretty conclusive graph. I am wondering if the 11 year scale would be better to align with solar cycles. This will show there is no correlation between cycles and temperatures.
iqumaster t1_izwli5l wrote
But then there is 100 000y orbit shape cycle and 41 000y tilt cycle and 26 000y wobble cycle. Although current understanding is that those are too long cycles to have this rapid warming effect
lololy87 t1_izua8uk wrote
Much easier to read
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments