Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

throwit_amita t1_izdvmjx wrote

I have a few questions - I'm interested in this stuff!

What's the source for these numbers?

How are you defining the "continents"? Can you add a lookup or table? Fyi Australia is its own continent.

If A is 2012 electricity produced and B is 2022 electricity produced, what's your calculation to determine % change?

4

Tsukikaiyo t1_ize5xna wrote

What does increase (pp) mean? Per person? That doesn't make much sense

4

multicm t1_izecez2 wrote

I am going to be a bit nitpicky here because of the subreddit we are on. The data is interesting, but this visualization is just bad. There is a lot that could have been done. For example, putting "Increase" on a second axis as a line, or better yet, remove it altogether and instead do a stacked bar with "2010" and "Increase". Would have made the graph much simpler and more visually appealing. With this being r/dataisbeautiful the context is about how nice a graph looks not necessarily the data itself.

19

Tedthe10 t1_izeyvzh wrote

It's wild that South America has around 70% of their energy produced by renewables and that number hasn't changed at all in 10 years

2

chemolz9 t1_izf0s1p wrote

Percent ist not the same as Percentage Points.

For example, if Europe has 21% renewables in 2010 and 48% renewables in 2020, that's a difference of 27 percentage points and an increase of 229 129 percent.

1

mkaszycki81 t1_izfqlst wrote

>For example, if Europe has 21% renewables in 2010 and 48% renewables in 2020, that's a difference of 27 percentage points and an increase of 229 percent.

2020 is 229% of 2010, which is an increase of 129%.

1

mkaszycki81 t1_izfqpqm wrote

Shame on South America for not achieving anything in ten years!

/s

2

PilzGalaxie t1_iznejwu wrote

The Green bar is confusing because it conveys not the slightest bit of additional Information.

1