Comments
LeroyoJenkins t1_j239jib wrote
God, that hurts my eyes.
That's not the correlation, that's just two lines on a chart which shouldn't have lines
What is the time period? Axes labels? Why are you using lines where there's no continuity? God, please rain fire and brimstone on this abomination!
If this was a high school math or data analysis project, this would be graded Zero.
Go back to the drawing board and make a scatter plot with each dot representing one country, but add labels to the axis, and then add the correlation line to it.
Ilmt206 t1_j239l5y wrote
Oof. Difficult to look at.
AdAcrobatic7236 t1_j23ilhx wrote
🔥My boy, Leroyo, be channeling the flapping tongue right outta my head…
BigMrTea t1_j23o7jl wrote
You know when Latvia becomes Japan you have trouble
AsexualMeatMannequin t1_j25dcao wrote
Hey I think making a scatter plot will convey the information much better. Try a scatter plot with gdp per capita on x-axis, pop growth on y axis, and each point representing a country. Then in excel you can add a trend line and R value if you want to see how closely correlated they are
Existing-Class-140 OP t1_j2381wh wrote
Source:
wikipedia GDP data and demographics data:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita
Separate Wikipedia articles for all countries' population data, example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Latvia#Vital_statistics (natural change per 1,000)
Tools:
MS Excel.