Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

LeroyoJenkins t1_j239jib wrote

God, that hurts my eyes.

That's not the correlation, that's just two lines on a chart which shouldn't have lines

What is the time period? Axes labels? Why are you using lines where there's no continuity? God, please rain fire and brimstone on this abomination!

If this was a high school math or data analysis project, this would be graded Zero.

Go back to the drawing board and make a scatter plot with each dot representing one country, but add labels to the axis, and then add the correlation line to it.

16

AdAcrobatic7236 t1_j23ilhx wrote

🔥My boy, Leroyo, be channeling the flapping tongue right outta my head…

2

BigMrTea t1_j23o7jl wrote

You know when Latvia becomes Japan you have trouble

1

Ilmt206 t1_j239l5y wrote

Oof. Difficult to look at.

2

Existing-Class-140 OP t1_j2381wh wrote

Source:

wikipedia GDP data and demographics data:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita

Separate Wikipedia articles for all countries' population data, example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Latvia#Vital_statistics (natural change per 1,000)

Tools:

MS Excel.

0

AsexualMeatMannequin t1_j25dcao wrote

Hey I think making a scatter plot will convey the information much better. Try a scatter plot with gdp per capita on x-axis, pop growth on y axis, and each point representing a country. Then in excel you can add a trend line and R value if you want to see how closely correlated they are

2