Submitted by meller12_3 t3_zc51r4 in dataisbeautiful
Comments
OrangeJuiceAlibi t1_iyuw4vu wrote
Fan fiction has a higher level of female readers and it's not necessarily sexual. If you made it purely sexual, or included fan art, she'd probably be higher.
hatbox_godiva t1_iyv8beb wrote
The commenter you replied to wasn't pointing out that Hermione's bubble isn't large. There's no bubble for Hermione at all. There also isn't one for Ron, Neville, or Luna. This whole bubble chart seems sus.
rhybgaro t1_iywitfd wrote
The data reflects favourited works rather than the quantity of works, which I agree is a bit of an unusual metric for the graphs question.
hatbox_godiva t1_iyx2r4y wrote
Yep, but my point stands. You can't tell me there are zero favorited works for pairing Harry with Hermione, Ron, Neville, or Luna while the count for Peeves is n i n e t y - s e v e n
rhybgaro t1_iyxp8a1 wrote
Oh yeah I agree with you, sorry! Was just saying what the data was reflecting and forgot to include that, my bad!
It's definitely odd that they're absent and it's not the case on ff.net at all as just looking at the filter for [Harry P./Hermione G.] shows multiple works with favs on the front page, some of which have thousands of favourites.
hatbox_godiva t1_iyxrqhi wrote
No need for apologies! My tone doesn't come across online, but the emphasis in my last comment was meant in a playful way, not combative 😅
rhybgaro t1_iyxwt87 wrote
All good! :D Tone via text is a bugger sometimes.
Misteral_Editorial t1_iyz25nq wrote
"Most (often) shipped with"
OrangeJuiceAlibi t1_iyvhca8 wrote
Huh, right enough, and I totally misunderstood.
RedditPremiumAccount t1_iyuu5bv wrote
Why not a clean bar chart? This format makes no sense nor is it beautiful
michal_hanu_la t1_iyv42n7 wrote
That is rather disturbing.
ArtesianDiff t1_iywlboe wrote
I think this is looking at all relationships, not only sexual ones. There's no way there is that many people writing father son incest with Harry and his son, on fanfiction.net. Ao3, maybe.
Soft-Repair264 t1_iyutc0l wrote
No 1999 Lego Luke Skywalker? I’ve lost hope in this world.
Equal-Crew-3367 t1_iyuu3ri wrote
Snape and Potter? Daddy issues hello?
Totale-Substanz t1_iyv4xrt wrote
Albus Potter ...
Grand_Negus_Zek t1_iyvgnif wrote
I’m offended that there’s no bubble for Sonichu. I believe Chris-Chan made one.
magnesiumb t1_iyxi0pm wrote
It would be better as a bar chart and you could have used the bar colors to indicate if the character was male or female. It's not presented in the best way like this.
meller12_3 OP t1_iyut0d9 wrote
SOURCE: kaggle.com/datasets/nehatiwari03/harry-potter-fanfiction-data
TOOLS: TABLEAU, CANVA
[deleted] t1_iyuv8r8 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iyuxi8e wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iyvr8jw wrote
[removed]
rhybgaro t1_iywi5e9 wrote
I wonder if data taken from other sites (such as ao3) would produce similar or different results for numbers of works tagged. Ffnet doesn't have the most useful pairing tags.
I don't think this necessarily means the most shipped with either. I looked out of interest and found 198 pages of works for harry/voldemort so that's a) a very high amount of favourites for a smaller number of works but b) a much smaller number of works published total than say Harry/Herminione (2.2k pages) or Draco (3.6k pages).
e: I was curious so looking at ff.net filtered to [Harry P/Hermione G.] has a total 12000~ favourites shown on one page of fanfiction alone. The data here is definitely a bit wonky.
[deleted] t1_izkmqy7 wrote
[removed]
aboat_i_sawaboat t1_iyw2gmb wrote
This makes me concerned for the human race
DameKumquat t1_iyuu7ff wrote
No Hermione at all? Sure she isn't supposed to be where Voldemort is?