Submitted by cangeola t3_z7v2wq in dataisbeautiful
ploki122 t1_iy8ryf6 wrote
Reply to comment by NorthImpossible8906 in Immigrant children born in Canada are less likely to follow religion [OC] by cangeola
>you forgot to finish your statement. When you use a word like 'less' or 'more' it always needs a 'than'.
You can always assume that it's "less than the opposite" therefore, Immigrant children born in Canada are less likely to follow religion than not.
NorthImpossible8906 t1_iy8totn wrote
> Immigrant children born in Canada are less likely to follow religion than not.
That is actually the wrong conclusion, so you inadvertently proved my point.
In fact, I don't understand your statement. Immigrant children are less likely to follow religion than not follow religion? ? ? ?
Here, if you decode all the graphics, the conclusion is that the 2nd generation children are less likely to follow religion than 1st generation children. That's what the graphics show with their labels, but I suspect that isn't what OP meant. Maybe it is that 1st generation of children born in canada of immigrant parents are less religion than their parents (the immigrants born abroad).
dolphinater t1_iy9mb50 wrote
pretty sure first generation is the actual immigrants born abroad and not first generation of children born to immigrants
Big_Slamma_Jamma t1_iy9j82i wrote
yeah you actually got the wrong conclusion, thus proving his point
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments