refreshing_username t1_ivvac4d wrote
I'm struggling to get anything from this. Looks like median days on market moved up or down largely independent of location? Or is there another point I'm missing?
boganvegan t1_ivvxeul wrote
If the median days on market increased by 24 days during a 30 day month that implies that sales have fallen off a cliff.
michigician OP t1_ivw67b4 wrote
That would be a percent increase.
boganvegan t1_ivw8nka wrote
Thank you for the correction
40for60 t1_ivyhb57 wrote
Percent of what? If it was 1 hour and it went up 24% now its 1 hour 15 min?
michigician OP t1_ivykw9j wrote
Days. Each home listed for sale has been on the market for a certain number of days. The data for all listings in a county has been used to calculate a median number of days on market for each county. This statistic is reported each month by realtor.com. This map shows the change in that statistic from September to October.
michigician OP t1_ivvfhqb wrote
Each county is calculated seperately.
refreshing_username t1_ivvisf5 wrote
I get that. I just cant see any pattern. It just lookes like static.
MaxRoofer t1_ivwl6mw wrote
I can’t even understand the key.
michigician OP t1_ivw5rvl wrote
Some of it is noise. You have to look for patterns, out west, in the north, in rural areas. But you are right, a lot of it is random.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments