Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

233C OP t1_ivovh9a wrote

I should have marked each "start" differently". although (low renewable; high CO2) is a fair guess for a starting point.

> The strong negative correlation is expected.

As can be seen, some countries managed the same gCO2/kWh with much lower % renewable than others.

The "common wisdom" of "let's add more renewable and gCO2/kWh will lower" is worth checking up.
What good did it do Belgium to go from 2 to 25%?
France did without moving from 4-5% what Finland did from 22 to 50%.
Denmark and Austria are nearing 75% and still can't touch what France already had with less than 20%.
Would Argentina (less than 10%) will have a better gCO2/kWh if it had as much renewable as Turkey (45%)? Maybe not

3

mgmaqueda t1_ivp58id wrote

I think those differences could mostly be explained with the share of nuclear in electricity for each country.

2