Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

TheDadThatGrills t1_ivjsqkb wrote

Doesn't seem unreasonable to say that better refrigeration infrastructure globally would lower food waste more than any other factor.

34

ethanthe12 t1_ivjyiw4 wrote

Doesn’t most food, after harvesting, or killing the animal. Only stay good for like 2-4 days, (raw), unrefrigerated

4

royalpatch t1_ivl52fp wrote

Some and unprocessed, sure. With proper storage, i.e., root cellar, potatoes can last months after harvest. Same for most root vegetables. (Carrots, onions, turnips, etc )

Canning can also preserve foods for upto a year usually.

You can also preserve eggs. (I assume meats too, but I've never done that).

7

vtTownie t1_ivlv9it wrote

Apples in cold storage last >1 year too

2

Mekito_Fox t1_ivqltfm wrote

Preserving meat would be salting, smoking, or making jerky. Homemade jerky in a fridge can last awhile. This is how it was done before electricity.

2

itswill95 t1_ivlcae9 wrote

why? this graph only seems to suggest that better refrigeration would lower food waste significantly in Nigeria

2

TheDadThatGrills t1_ivldd54 wrote

Nigeria has over 200M people and are losing 45% of their food due to lack of refrigeration. The math answers the question.

5

rammo123 t1_ivlvpa9 wrote

Safe to assume that similar logic applies to the other high-waste African nations too. Only Nigeria is highlighted since it's the worst.

3

itswill95 t1_ivmo8cp wrote

i dont think so one data point doesnt make a trend

1

earthlymonarch OP t1_ivjc5fe wrote

Source: UNEP 2021 Food Waste Index Report

Tools: Tableau

Note that due to the lack of data for some countries, UNEP partially uses regional data to extrapolate. Countries whose data rely on such extrapolation have been assigned low confidence levels; hence, I have only included countries with high to medium confidence levels for food waste estimates. More can be found on page 12 of the report.

10

thatdudeinshorts t1_ivjevxz wrote

I’m reading through the UNEP 2021 report and I’m rather annoyed with this methodology. I understand it from a greenhouse gas standpoint, but the inclusion of non edible materials in “food waste” and saying that land application of excess food/waste counts as “food waste” seems like a serious cultural and structural oversight. The report also seems to meander around the impact of lack of cold storage on food waste, stating in its initial findings that it was not impactful, then later stating that it was massively impactful on Nigeria as an example.

14

rmoritz t1_ivk6vsw wrote

Really nice presentation of the data. Informative, intuitive, and appealing.

10

AfricanNorwegian t1_ivk4b36 wrote

This is per household though, not per person.

​

The average household in Nigera consists of 5.06 individuals, whereas in Sweden it is only 2.17 individuals.

​

On this graph Sweden appears to waste roughly 80kg of food per household, and Nigeria wastes roughly 190kg per household.

However, divide that per person in each household and Sweden is wasting 36.9kg per person and Nigeria is wasting 37.5kg per person.

​

The graph seems to imply that Nigerians waste 2x more food than Swedes, when actually there is almost no difference.

7

earthlymonarch OP t1_ivk7hvy wrote

Data explicitly says per capita, not per household. But it is considering all food waste in the household context (vs. retail, production, transport etc.)

12

AfricanNorwegian t1_ivk9krq wrote

> Annual household wastage (kg/capita)

The per capita here is per household, not per person.

−1

isaacwoods_ t1_ivkekgj wrote

I read it as meaning food waste in the household, as opposed to commercial waste (so still regular per capita, otherwise you’d just write kg/household surely?)

7

ASuarezMascareno t1_ivkgfpq wrote

My first interpretation is that its household waste normalized per capita (so if a household is 4 people, the per household would be 4 times higher).

4

AfricanNorwegian t1_ivkh0t4 wrote

Then surely it would say normalised

−2

ASuarezMascareno t1_ivkhyxl wrote

That's what per capita means. Otherwise would say kg/household.

4

AfricanNorwegian t1_ivko1x7 wrote

Then why mention the household at all if it is just per person.

That’s like me saying “household income per capita” and then saying “no it’s not average household income it’s income per person”. If that were the case I should just say “income per capita”

1

ASuarezMascareno t1_ivkt2jw wrote

Because it is household waste only. Food wasted in other placed (restaurant, supermarket, industry) is not accounted for.

3

asseatstonk t1_ivjf386 wrote

Russia is cheating! You just throw it outside and it freezes for millenias to come. I mean, they still have frozen Mammoth-Steaks

5

rammo123 t1_ivlw1ej wrote

"China introduced fines ... on mukbang vloggers".

I can definitely get behind that.

4

StealthedWorgen t1_ivkg7l4 wrote

Africa needs to start harnessing the power of the sun to keep things cold.

2

Frisky_Potato42nite t1_ivmregr wrote

I'm surprised on how low the US is. I've seen plenty of pictures of grocery stores toss literal truck loads of still edible food.

2

OldGloryInsuranceBot t1_ivndwve wrote

The European country with the worst food security is Hungry…. sorry, Hungary.

1

flitzerad_girl t1_ivnogi9 wrote

Judging from the breakdown by others that the methodology doenst account for the different distribution of agriculture. If a country has larger percentage of its population working as farmers then they'd have a higher wastage by household per capita which doesn't seem accounted for by the other axis judging by the legend.

1