Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

brainwashedASSHOLE t1_iv57sar wrote

All printed out of thin air, backed by nothing and loaned at interest. Banks are an enormous Ponzi. The US needs to issue its own currency. Get rid of the FED and the banking cartels.

−16

hummelbummeldummel t1_iv58mux wrote

How much should be the additional profit tax if it exceeds 10% of the capital?

7

FartyMcShart t1_iv5d9w2 wrote

JPM is the largest bank in the world not just in the US FYI

1

mjb2012 t1_iv5p7ay wrote

I'm sure the $12B they got in 2008 didn't hurt, either.

Anyway, I like the use of the gradient to differentiate the expenses from the profit.

2

ThePanoptic t1_iv98m9k wrote

19% tax rate? That's lower than most middle-lower class families...

Why are our tax laws backward?

4

ThePanoptic t1_iv9tq7y wrote

current tax code:

22% on income between $41,776 and $89,075 which is the lower-middle class in most states.

24% for upper-middle class between $89,076 and $170,050

I understand that it’s a progressive tax rate and only dollars above this range are taxed at this rate, but it’s still criminal that corporations are keeping records profits at lower than the rate for an average individuals tax bracket.

Families might get deductions/rebates, but this is the standard for individuals within this tax bracket. Lower than a multibillion dollar corporation.

3

ThePanoptic t1_iv9tvin wrote

I understand that corporate rate are calculated differently but the bottom line is that 19% of their profits are lost to tax, while an individual making $41,776 - 89,075, will lose 22% of that bracket income to tax. Corporations should at least have a higher bracket at the top, especially when tens of billions are the profit margins.

1