Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Vilko3259 t1_iu7n2kp wrote

per capita is usually the way to go but in this case it might be strange as the populations have changed a ton over the years.

Also, you can pretty clearly draw conclusions from the graph already, like judging which proportion of US residents since 1850 were born where. Per capita numbers would just obfuscate

7

Maguncia t1_iuam78c wrote

Well, I think that's exactly what the map is trying to show, that "ton of change" - how some states have historically been much larger. Per capita makes that a bit clearer.

1