Submitted by CharcoalCharts t3_xzx2aq in dataisbeautiful
Comments
cornfeedhobo t1_irotam8 wrote
I feel like the real message here is how data poor the PoI API is.
SkavensWhiteRaven t1_irotiov wrote
So odd the cities I've been to were nothing like I was expecting... What does "point of interest" mean just high traffic?
CantRemember45 t1_irovuoz wrote
what does point of interest mean in this context?
OsakaWilson t1_irp0m2e wrote
Are you sure you are measuring what you think you are measuring?
dog_eat_god t1_irp31ox wrote
I'm pretty sure I can find more points of interest in Cairo than in Canberra. I spent a couple of days in Cairo but that only scratched the surface.
Charred_nuns t1_irpu9o7 wrote
You could spend a month in Canberra and not find one point of interest
e_schimdt t1_irq9t5u wrote
But it's also kinda right since Metro Manila is the National Capital Region
AustralYew t1_irqk6qq wrote
That's some bullshit, man. Paris and Rome are like 99% points of interest. Damascus (pre-war, anyway) was like 100%. The sources for this are dumb.
LanewayRat t1_irr5y43 wrote
I think it’s because the “points of interest” are actually “points of boredom”. Canberra is a planned capital full of things designed to be “interesting” but that mostly fail.
thwi t1_irr8eig wrote
Is the Eiffel Tower a point of interest? It sure is a point of interest, but it wouldn't add much to the total area that is considered a point of interest. Compare that to a city that has a large square in the center. The square is way less point-of-interesty than the Eiffel Tower, but it would add quite a big area.
Genuine_Smokey t1_irriw8c wrote
For Moscow it must just mean: "Shitshow"
glass4ever t1_irs0sdq wrote
It’s a percentage of the area of the city which is considered (by federal authorities I guess) as a sightseeing or as a cultural attraction
CharcoalCharts OP t1_iroqqe5 wrote
The data is from Google Maps API. That is also the tool used. All images are the same zoom level.
% = (colored area)/(total area - black area)