Comments
michigician OP t1_ir60898 wrote
Percent of active listings, active in September, 2022 that have received a price reduction.
thedrcubed t1_ir61npu wrote
Just from my area it looks like the more desirable locations are the ones dropping in price which isn't surprising because they're the ones that had gotten way overpriced
michigician OP t1_ir66f6n wrote
This data is significant because it shows the market response by region to the increase in home financing cost over the past few months.
thedrcubed t1_ir66ks8 wrote
Agreed and I appreciate you posting it
heathenbeast t1_ir67qj5 wrote
I was just browsing Trulia in my area last night and noted to the wife that many of the homes had Reduced their pricing at some point; some significantly.
RD__III t1_ir67x0k wrote
The MLS tracks every time a listing has been posted, as well as any price reductions. They likely just went through every listing and counted any that had a "price reduction" input after the most recent "closed" input.
jkatz20740 t1_ir6de8o wrote
Would be interesting to see this data over time.
coffeeismydoc t1_ir6e36k wrote
How do some regions have over 100%?
euclitorous t1_ir6i2me wrote
I fail to see what this has to do with major league soccer
[deleted] t1_ir6ju5y wrote
[removed]
Comfortable-Boot-915 t1_ir6jwh3 wrote
I downvoted because i didnt know what "MLS" is and its frustrating that the author either assumed we would know or didnt care to clarify. I liked the comment about major league soccer that hinted at this.
dog_eat_god t1_ir6jy9c wrote
This is great info. Please do this each month if you're able to.
lart2150 t1_ir6p7fy wrote
I assume if there is a price reduction and then the property goes off market before the end of the month? not sure if the data is good in Alaska with that 1517.
michigician OP t1_ir6sdrx wrote
There is either error iinin the data, or I used the wrong data field. It is probably my error, using active listings as the denominator instead of total listings.
JohnnyAK907 t1_ir6sktf wrote
I wish these images had darker lines separating the states. I'm looking for my region and the color gradients make both my brain and eyes hurt.
michigician OP t1_ir6tiko wrote
The data is by county. There are a number of data fields that provide counts of listings: active listings, pending listings, and total listings. There are also data fields for increased price listings, and price reduction listings. This map is based on reduced price listings divided by active listings times 100.
I am going to check if using the total listings as the denominator eliminates the problem that some counties show more reduced price listings than active listings.
michigician OP t1_ir6topu wrote
Fair criticism.
tico_pico t1_ir6uvcy wrote
Sorry, I meant the actual code behind the map itself. I am curious about the back end on how you actually created the map.
Likely_a_bot t1_ir6zsja wrote
Price reductions tend to follow fluid dynamics. The markets where we saw the high prices first will receive the reductions first, with the late comers like my market cooling down in the next few months.
[deleted] t1_ir70k5u wrote
[removed]
bradland t1_ir79t1h wrote
The question is, how does this compare to prior periods? Are price reductions a normal part of the market mechanism? That is to say, is it all that unusual for someone to list a home at a high price, then drop the price to find the market fit?
TheMostInterestedMan t1_ir7h1uz wrote
Ah yes, Phoenix is representing well; the market was hot and overstated for way too long. In my immediate area since 2012, the total housing price increase is over 300% which is just ludicrous.
grammar__cop t1_ir7kmn5 wrote
Tbf (to be fair), it doesn’t take much effort to google ‘mls home listings’.
azunaki t1_ir7mqn9 wrote
Does it handle if a property receives more than one price reduction?
Lethlnjektn t1_ir7n27f wrote
Is there a way to stop from seeing maps/charts/graphs like this constantly in my feed or do I have to unfollow the sub entirely? I see a thing similar to this one Every Single Day
RDMvb6 t1_ir7pqoe wrote
It’s important to note that in most areas even tho the price of the home is going down, the total monthly cost of ownership is going up because the decrease in purchase price is outweighed by the increase in interest cost. This is still not good news for people who are priced out of the home market.
AaronsLennon t1_ir7q69p wrote
While I question the formula used I can indeed confirm that price changes have not occured in 2020 or 2021. Homes sold immediately and for well over list price in my area. I.e. home were not on the market long enough for the seller to change the price.
Price changes are normal in an average market but these numbers are all new to anyone who has been watching the market for only the last 3 years.
elementofpee t1_ir7rroz wrote
Bring it on. Let the Great Reset begin.
Sure_Surprise_1661 t1_ir7uil4 wrote
Some very serious omissions here. From when to September? Is this a reduction in the median?
I see my home county at 40-50 but it the median went up 30-40.
This can be very deceptive.
RedRabbit37 t1_ir7zeqn wrote
I mean their expansion efforts have clearly become ridiculous. I mean Las Vegas, Indianapolis, San Diego, Detroit and Phoenix: ok. But every populated county in the US? No wonder their value is going down. The playoffs will be a mess that’s for sure.
willwork4pii t1_ir81hl3 wrote
now show us time on market vs this time last year
classicalL t1_ir858vm wrote
You ruin your credibility when you don't notice your figure has impossible values like 105 and 405 in it. At least bother to proof your post before you do it...
TerrysClavicle t1_ir86f61 wrote
You can always not read it.
FarfromaHero40 t1_ir8eoy0 wrote
Yes excellent work - am looking to buy 07-08/2023. Love the overall trend down to the granular.
aureliao t1_ir8hlgc wrote
Neat data. You have a lot of good feedback here. I agree with other commenters - 1) The color scale should have better contrast. 2) you need to check your data as there are multiple areas with 100%+ and even multiple with 1000%+. 3) Strong state borders would make it easier to identify.
atlantachicago t1_ir8hn83 wrote
Ok, can we stop raising interest rates now?
Notor1ousNate t1_ir8hry6 wrote
🤷♂️ I know this isn’t accurate based solely on the handful of counties I service and their representation on the map. Either your data is WAY wrong or the way you got your number is WAY wrong. Listings in one of the counts colored at 50% or more listings reduced sold at 98% of list price for September.
miso_very_sorry t1_ir8j3ly wrote
Do you post this data regularly anywhere? Would love to monitor this over time.
michigician OP t1_ir8lbip wrote
The software is QGIS. The County map is US Census Tiger Cartographic shapefile set by county. I have to make some changes to the realtor.com csv file, the county id numbers which start with 0 lose the initial 0 so I have to add the 0 and convert the field to text using Libreoffice Calc.
imnotsoho t1_ird8u1h wrote
Both can be true if the house sells for listing price after reduction.
Notor1ousNate t1_ireiobw wrote
No, list price is the original price it was listed at.
[deleted] t1_ir5uzej wrote
[removed]