Submitted by dbabbitt t3_yhskig in dataisbeautiful
magnesiumb t1_iugalat wrote
The correlation really isn’t that strong. Worth attention, but something is going on. Is there a list of countries used in this?
Frankly, fertility rate is a product of several things. You’re going to need to include more variables into your model (rurality, level of education, access to family planning services, for starters).
dbabbitt OP t1_iuhi2gv wrote
In the social sciences, something that "explains" 67 percent of the variability is rare. What are you basing your claim on?
magnesiumb t1_iuikz0f wrote
I was taught 0.8 and above was strong. I work in laboratory science mainly.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments