Submitted by orgtre t3_xujlqk in dataisbeautiful
trucorsair t1_ir0d9fq wrote
Reply to comment by dailycyberiad in The returns to learning the most common words, by language [OC] by orgtre
The title is unclear. You just spent how many words to explain a TITLE, does that not suggest it is cryptic? No one mentioned the graph itself….
Your not thinking it is cryptic does not discount that other people find it cryptic. Your opinion is equal to any others, no more-no less.
The title COULD have been “Minimum number of words needed to be learned to be able to read a book in a foreign language”. Longer, sure but also much clearer as to intent
dailycyberiad t1_ir1wmaq wrote
I used a lot of words to explain it to you, because you didn't understand. Many other people didn't need the explanation. And your opinion seems to be the minority, seeing how most comments focus on the graph itself.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments