Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_iufelme wrote

2

Majestic_Food_4190 t1_iuffq2e wrote

I mean.... It does contain the same information. If the CEO was bad, the stock price wouldn't go up. It at the very least implies how the CEO is currently doing.

And ok, your 40% was making up numbers, gotcha.

−4

[deleted] t1_iufmah1 wrote

[deleted]

2

Majestic_Food_4190 t1_iufnbzt wrote

Again, making up fictional numbers to illustrate your point. There is no 1000 nor 1400, you're rounding. You're also negating the DJIA and doing some sort of rounding between that and the S&P.

And 10%? Those others "90%" of factors impacting a stock price are also heavily influenced by the CEO.

Anyhow, have a great day with your made up numbers 👍🏻

−2

[deleted] t1_iufo08q wrote

[deleted]

1

Majestic_Food_4190 t1_iufss5v wrote

CEO is 48% greater than DJIA... I'll go ahead and use your method and say it's 50% greater. Because twisting statistics is apparently what YOU do in the real world.

50% greater growth sounds substantial to anyone that understands numbers.

0