Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

leigon16 t1_jci5pw3 wrote

Thanks for making this plot. I figured derailments occurred pretty frequently based on the constant reporting of them since the incident in East Palestine, but I had no data at all to back up that claim. It doesn’t seem they are happening all that more frequently, just that MSM has realized this is another type of disaster that drives traffic to their sites via clicks.

To be clear, not downplaying their significance or the hardship that individual communities experience as a result of them. It just feels incredibly cynical to all of a sudden begin reporting on every single one of them because they realized that “if it bleeds it leads” applies to trains as well as humans.

2

LSeww t1_jcic115 wrote

>derailments occurred pretty frequently

only in USA, about 1000 per year. In european countries it's single digits per year.

1

leigon16 t1_jciob5h wrote

On the conservative side of your European argument that means you have a derailment every two months (assuming 6 per year). Train derailments make news nationally in the US maybe once every 3-5 years. Thanks for proving my point by being a European exceptionalist!

1

Lost-Recording3890 t1_jcimwbc wrote

Europe doesn’t have as nearly vast of a rail network.

−1

exculcator t1_jcjpflv wrote

Not so. There is currently about 260 000 km of railways in the US (of which about 150000 are 1st class), while there are 200 000 km in "Europe", which doesn't include places like the UK (over 15 000 km), so the two are very similar in terms of route length (adding in Canada and Mexico would make North America seem quite a bit bigger).

Edit: it occurs to me that the quoted figures are mostly route lengths, not track lengths. Since double tracking is much more prevalent in Europe than the US, I suspect the actual length of track is higher in Europe.

1