Submitted by TravelTime_LKB t3_123rl5v in dataisbeautiful
Sophroniskos t1_jdwmdg1 wrote
Reply to comment by TravelTime_LKB in Compare Public Transport Network Connectivity In 10 European Countries [OC] by TravelTime_LKB
it probably looks like this because, in Switzerland, the density in the dense parts is "denser" than in Germany
LordElend t1_jdx98c1 wrote
Switzerland Germany
Population: 8,703,000 83,196,000
Inhabitants/km²: 210.8 232.7
rosszboss t1_jdxik45 wrote
They said dense parts, compare Berlin to zurich
LordElend t1_jdxkr0w wrote
Population density Source: Wikipedia, 2023.
3900 people/km² Berlin
4092 people/km² Zürich
SuperSMT t1_jdzrxzo wrote
Still not directly comparable, especially using arbitrary city boundaries
It would be hard to do but the most apt comparison is between all of the swiss lowlands in the north vs an equivalent size area of germany
LordElend t1_jdzy3v3 wrote
swiss lowlands 10'062,05 km²
Inhabitants/km²: 380
Which region of Germany should I use so it can be comparable?
Sophroniskos t1_je6b83x wrote
The Saarland has a population density of 382. However, regardless of the actual density, every dense region will look completely red. It's just that Germany has no large uninhabited areas whereas the Alps in Switzerland are almost uninhabitable.
TLDR: Switzerland's network is denser, it just has bigger holes
LordElend t1_je6ydgi wrote
Swiss train service is a lot better though we can agree on that. Without looking down on the Deutsche Bahn.
Elibu t1_je53dbh wrote
That's arbitrary as well.
EmpereurAuguste t1_je43zor wrote
You cannot tell the efficiency of a countries public transport just by looking at the dots, maybe more busses/trains go through them and more people use it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments