Submitted by TravelTime_LKB t3_123rl5v in dataisbeautiful
marioquartz t1_jdwkdx6 wrote
Reply to comment by lizufyr in Compare Public Transport Network Connectivity In 10 European Countries [OC] by TravelTime_LKB
Switzerland
Canton with less meters above sea have its capital have an elevation of 373m
Canton with more meters above sea have its capital have an elevation of 512m
Spain:
City with higher elevation in the peninsula: Avila with 1131m
And a lot of cities in the coast.
The diference in elevation is higher in Spain. The same train can (theorically) travel from Avila to the north coast.
AstraImKoerper t1_jdx6t7q wrote
In switzerland the trains not only connect the capitals.You can drive with the train to jungfraujoch 3454m.If you drive from Chur 515 to Brig 491 (both capitals) you can drive up to the Oberalppass 2042m down to andermatt 1400m and up again to furka 2100m.
Allthough its faster to drive the long way around with the tunnels.The huge benefit is that switzerland is so small, way easier to build lasting infrastructure.
i just checked for lulz.
Avila-valladoid-gijon with train only is 2400m up and 3500m down with 393km.
Brig-andermatt-chur with train only is 4100 up and 4100 down with 280km.
Four_beastlings t1_jdxrhq9 wrote
There are no mountains at all until 110kms before Gijón, then it gets mountainous af for a while but there are tunnels. The centre of Spain is elevated, but plain. The reason there aren't more railways there is because it's basically empty.
Source: I'm literally on the Madrid-Valladolid-Gijon route right now.
nac_nabuc t1_je23ukk wrote
Bound to Madrid or Gijón? If it's the latter, please drink a Sidra on our behalf. :-D
Four_beastlings t1_je23xwf wrote
Already did, but will do again tomorrow for you!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments