Submitted by lemonzestttttttt t3_11n1q8k in dataisbeautiful
Amerikanen t1_jbnsxr6 wrote
Reply to comment by pocketdare in Debt Per Capita of Major Cities by lemonzestttttttt
I looked at both sources briefly, both are municipal (not personal debt).
However, the data Forbes links to is a much broader measure of municipal debt and the one OP is narrower.
For NYC OP's source is 86B in debt from the city's annual report, and Forbes/Truth in Accounting is 256B. The major difference seems to be the inclusion of unfunded pension and health insurance benefits to city employees.
The use of denominator will also matter for the levels (fewer taxpayers than population), but shouldn't affect the ordering of cities as much as what's included in "debt."
pocketdare t1_jbodurj wrote
Great points. Thanks for doing the legwork. Including the unfunded pension and benefits information would seem, from an accounting standard, to be the more honest, accurate and frightening figure. Also certainly makes me concerned as a condo owner in NYC!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments