Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

StuckinReverse89 t1_jagsdbb wrote

Yes until episode 3. Episode 3 is a pretty big milestone where things occur before or after it and not really concurrent.

Obi wan is distinctly after episode 3, as is Rogue one and solo (actually Rogue One should be after Obi Wan imo since the death star plans is probably a bit after Obi Wans adventure and Rogue one ends directly where episode 4 begins).

Solo also definitely ends before episode 4 begins (honestly maybe even before Rogue one) since the movie ends with young Solo. It was also supposed to be the lead up to the rugged Solo we meet before episode 4 begins.

4

Likeitisouthere OP t1_jagt5nd wrote

Yeah, I agree with you on all that Solo really is like throwing a wrench in the whole thing. I have it stretched out that long because he reappears with Rey and Kylo

I was really trying to find out where to put Obi Wan for a starting point. The issue with him in the movies and shows is that they shown him at 20-30 years old let's say and then 60-70 years old.. there’s no youth story to obi.

We all know Yoda is like 1000 years old lol and other characters youth, but we don’t really know Obi-Wans starting point or youth

1

StuckinReverse89 t1_jagtspp wrote

Are you talking about Solo the character or Solo the movie because those are two different things.

Solo the character spans from mid episode 3 to basically episode 7 (and 9 if you count ghosts I guess) but the movie is a small segment after 3 and before 4.

Obi Wan storywise takes place only post episode 3 pre episode 4 although there are flashbacks to moments between episode 2 and 3 (the training scene).

There is no Obi Wan youth movie but there are youth books covering his time period from trainee just becoming Qui Gon’s apprentice to episode 1 although this might be considered legends now. Also, going into that territory is another can of worms since there are alot of Star Wars books (there is also one covering Anakin’s early years between episode 1 and 2 for example).

5

Likeitisouthere OP t1_jahtpgt wrote

Solo as character his influence/appearance is in the films/shows. Not just the movie.

In this chart, it’s how the character appears in the film/shows and 9 times out of 10, more than likely alive for the most part, there’s like 5-10 minutes of them or longer in the film/show.

Also with Star Wars there’s no information even in movies on the characters. The character was born on this day and died on this day lived this long. There’s no timestamps, which is cool but also confusing as to organizing the content

I built this in a situation, where as if someone is sitting down l, they bought all the Star Wars films/tv shows. They wanted to watch the galaxy in order or where to put the characters, make the most sense of everything… how does the one person need to watch it or connect everything together roughly where they watched it one way or the other.

Had the thought with me that, one could watch Star Wars depending on how they’re feeling/interested in probably 100 different ways.

1

darthvirgin t1_jahz2nt wrote

You seem confused about whether you’re graphing specific films/shows etc or specific characters. Why would “Solo” represent Han Solo’s lifespan in this chart when essentially every other entry is a specific movie/show/book? The logic of your chart is not internally consistent.

3

Likeitisouthere OP t1_jai1zpk wrote

In the chart there’s no books/games, it’s just film/shows. Its built out for just a person sitting down and saying show me the force, I’ll spend 100 or 200 hours watching the Star Wars and roughly trying understand/uncover the force, characters in time frames and understanding whatever George Lucas is trying to show everyone/viewers respectively.

Figured out 4/5ths of way through it’s actually difficult to have replications of born January 1st lived 100hrs es died January 1st. Or how a company lasted 50 years or been around for 200 years established this day and still producing. I was born on this month day and time, my social security is this and that.

I totally understand/get what everyone’s saying. If I had the time to sit down with George Lucas and get a confirmation on everything it would be detailed as such haha.

Also would like to read all the books and play the games but we only know so much. With all that said 80% way through, finished post published. Didn’t get paid for it, someone can perhaps take it from here and perfect it.

But agree with what everyone’s saying.. one can easily get confused with few things or there’s gaps between periods in content and people crossing paths in the films, hard to master/know everything haha.

That’s why I posted hopefully someone get inspired and makes a way better versions that’s 100% pinpointed and spot on accurate.

1

StuckinReverse89 t1_jaj75qm wrote

Then the graph is confusing because the labelled arnt the same with no markers to distinguish differences.

You put in movies which makes the graph appear to be a chronology based on movies and tv shows. You then randomly add in Han Solo only, also using just Solo which there is a movie which gives the reader the assumption that you are tracking where the movie falls in the chronology rather than the character. Its not internally consistent.

Better to keep them separate graphs or at least have distinct markings to differentiate between characters and movies/shows and also include other characters. We know Luke and Leia were born at the end of episode 3 and both live to the end of episode 8 for example. Vader and Obi Wan are born some time before episode 1 and Obi Wan lives until one third of episode 4 and Vader until end of episode 6. Palps is pre-episode 1 to episode 6 with his clone then born and then dies at the end of episode 9.

2

littlebabybuddy24 t1_jahpi65 wrote

Age is not a good indicator of how much time has passed in the Star Wars universe because different species age differently, and also at different rates. You can’t compare Yoda’s species for a human’s.

2