Submitted by TotallyCalculated t3_10qj23l in dataisbeautiful
Comments
BBOoff t1_j6sg7x3 wrote
Housing and feeding, yes (although the people in question are soldiers and their dependants). "Education" is pushing it. While there are some programs that encourage soldiers to get degrees before/during/after service, that can also cover a lot of very specific military training.
[deleted] t1_j6uyaxg wrote
[deleted]
TotallyCalculated OP t1_j6qbbim wrote
Sources:
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/debating-defence-budgets-why-military-purchasing-power-parity-matters (Brief explanation of what Military PPP is and why it gives a more accurate picture than nominal defense budgets, for the few Countries the data is obtainable from)
https://databank.worldbank.org/ (GDP, GDP-PPP, Mil. Exp, and Mil. Exp %GDP figures)
Made with: Google Sheets, Adobe Illustrator, and Photoshop
opi_2023 t1_j6qi3oq wrote
Probably more recent data at UN's Office of Disarmament - https://milex.un-arm.org/
It has all jumped up since 2019. They have data from the 80's and defense budgets never seem to go down.
Mydios t1_j6so5la wrote
Logarithmic y-axis kind of gives a skewed view here due to trying to include mutiple datasets. The total gdp dataset range dominates the military budget one making the military budget one not really expressing the differences between nations as well. e.g. India seems kind of close to USA here whilst in reality there PPP budget is still only 1/3rd of the US one
CyberianK t1_j6tgpuz wrote
Is this an ISU-152 from WW2?
fiftycamelsworth t1_j6qhkia wrote
Isn’t a large amount of the military expenditure just like… educating, housing and feeding people?