🔥 A Polar Bear following photographer Paul Souders from under the ice.Submitted by W0lfsKitten t3_10obyn5 in creepy
halmyradov t1_j6ewcb5 wrote
Reply to comment by KuroOni in 🔥 A Polar Bear following photographer Paul Souders from under the ice. by W0lfsKitten
Depends what lens I'll be using, and if there's a safehouse somewhere.
For a billion, I'm ready to take even the stupidest odds
445nm t1_j6ex9v2 wrote
No one said you can't take a gun.
For a billion, you can probably take the bloody pictures from within an APC with machineguns and stuff.
Unless people show up and say that these can't even tickle bears because bears are literal gods or something.
only_for_browsing t1_j6h19t2 wrote
Fun fact, the original word for bear is lost because people were so afraid that if you said it a bear would show up and eat you, so they used the word that eventually morphed into bear as a euphemism
hehehuh t1_j6hh0nu wrote
It's not really lost, I think. Some languages still use it, for example ursus in Latin is afaik closely related to the original Germanic word. But indeed bear is derived from the word brown
only_for_browsing t1_j6hjbkq wrote
I'm going off my brother who is almost worryingly obsessed with bears. Apparently ursa and other bear words all came from proto Indo European and all are not the original word for bear, which is lost, because of the fear. He could definitely be wrong but that's how he tells it
KuroOni t1_j6ey4m7 wrote
given that this bear is very clearly stalking the photographer, I am assuming it is the kind of lens that needs you to get up close to that beast. And since AFAIK polar bears avoid getting close to humans I don't think there is any safehouse in the area.
​
Hope you can outrun a polar bear because I am not sure even usain bolt in his prime will be able to.
Sparrowbuck t1_j6fz8u9 wrote
Hahah no they don’t. They’ll go wherever they like, humans or no.
They will 100% stalk and eat people. Anything that moves = food. Seals or carrion or garbage are usually just easier food.
fuqdisshite t1_j6fzzik wrote
the point is that if you are ever ANYWHERE and you see a polar bear watching you, you are now food. they do not waste energy following something that will not provide a source of food. obviously this photog is prepared, maybe a snowmobile sitting behind him, but this is the exception, not the rule.
Sparrowbuck t1_j6g0vfj wrote
He was in a little boat. This is actually from a really nice photograph book
fuqdisshite t1_j6g200s wrote
got it.
as a lover of the cold two of my bucket list items are the ice caps.
KuroOni t1_j6g2fqp wrote
Well, as it turns out, from a quick google search (an actual expert might jump in and correct me because as we all know google is not a cery reliable scientifically accurate source). Polar bears do in fact avoid humans when possible so my statement is indeed true, according to the same sources, they would rather hunt what they are used to hunt aka seals because they run less, they fight less, they look less intimidating and less "alien" than us humans.
Due to human activities and climate change, they are sometimes forced to take more risks by going close to humans to get food but they still prefer to keep their distance unless they really need food.
So no they don't just jump at anything that moves unless they are desperate. It is similar with a lot of other predators as well, they try to avoid people too.
SirGlenn t1_j6fvaz3 wrote
I heard my dog barking like insane mad, I ran out my back door and my face was a foot away from a black bear's face: I slammed my door on the black bear, went around the corner in my kitchen, looked out the window as the black bear ran fast as a black bear can run, into the woods: a polar bear would have made me, his lunch.
bogdanbiv t1_j6f7rqc wrote
No safehouse will provide you with such an angle. Maybe a boat?
But even in a boat this is stupidly dangerous
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments