Comments
T3cca t1_j2dybrt wrote
pareidolia?
mrf87 t1_j2dzhl5 wrote
Come play with us Danny forever and ever
AmandaTheCat t1_j2e0iiu wrote
I wonder which one is mom's favorite (only one has shoes on).
cat6Wire t1_j2e7ged wrote
totally room 237 energy
I_need_a_better_name t1_j2e7kbx wrote
They may have all worn those at one time
mrf87 t1_j2e7qr9 wrote
Right??!!
cat6Wire t1_j2e80bq wrote
sonofeast11 t1_j2ea7uj wrote
What is it
[deleted] t1_j2ebfkp wrote
[removed]
phillyboo69187916 t1_j2ec5ff wrote
What am I missing here?
ttaway420 t1_j2ecf23 wrote
Weird face behind the two boys in the middle
phillyboo69187916 t1_j2ecqie wrote
Oh just looks like a kid
coolwool t1_j2ede1f wrote
It is. It's one of "the others".
jesswhatsername t1_j2ejm3o wrote
Not the one in the back..
KreagerStein t1_j2el25g wrote
Perhaps or these old films had a quirk, sometimes films were reused which means some had previous images still stuck on the film, resulting in a composite. This image could very well be one of those.
xXTheFETTXx t1_j2elecw wrote
You mean the least favorite one?
xXTheFETTXx t1_j2eln66 wrote
I was going to say this could be a double exposure, but there are no legs.
[deleted] t1_j2emm6l wrote
[deleted] t1_j2eph50 wrote
[removed]
Lopsided_Bicycle3884 t1_j2eqje4 wrote
Nightmare fuel - nice one!
wendywams t1_j2erb5q wrote
Took me a while to find the fourth child.
badass4102 t1_j2erqpa wrote
r/pareidolia
FaultProfessional163 t1_j2es95t wrote
Bro thinks he's part of the family
MNCPA t1_j2eshl7 wrote
A picture.
dv89 t1_j2espvv wrote
Is this Nick Cage?
upornicorn t1_j2esxc0 wrote
I wish I hadn’t now
La_Marina t1_j2ewlcu wrote
It’s a little person!
[deleted] t1_j2exaa5 wrote
[removed]
I_make_switch_a_roos t1_j2exqiq wrote
justAPersonOnGoogle2 t1_j2eycu9 wrote
How did i miss that
FFS_WORD_WORD_NUMBER t1_j2eyrkk wrote
Just looks like a person?
jlredding_91 t1_j2ezaft wrote
jlredding_91 t1_j2ezfej wrote
5 to be exact.
xombae t1_j2ezlse wrote
Look at the feet. Pretty sure there's just another kid standing back there.
halfeclipsed t1_j2f09m9 wrote
That's why he is in the back. He had to sneak in the picture because mom wouldn't let him in.
NSFWThrowaway1239 t1_j2f212e wrote
If its not a ghost or an actual person, I think it's double exposure. As dumb as it sounds, I think that looks way too much like a face (and head, even) to be paredolia.
disterb t1_j2f229t wrote
GordieLaChance t1_j2f2hdh wrote
Does no one else see the witchy face to the left of the tallest boy's head? I thought that was the point of the post but I guess it's the face in the middle.
ataxi_a t1_j2f2vdb wrote
He snuck into the picture like the little half cockroach bastard he is. He could hide his cockroach body behind his brothers, but he couldn't hide that one long cockroach antenna that his ma hadn't broke off yet to switch his nasty cockroach ass with.
someguy7710 t1_j2f3as1 wrote
I agree. Way too much to be paredoli
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2f3kcn wrote
This is a repost of my photo. It’s my grandma’s four older brothers. She had the photo on her dresser when I was growing up. We could never decide if that’s a face in the bushes or a trick of the light, but it’s definitely not my great grandmother or someone my grandma recognized
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2f3rgi wrote
I mentioned in another comment that this is a repost of my photo. It’s my grandmother’s 4 brothers. She didn’t recognize the 5th “face.”
MongoBongoTown t1_j2f44t5 wrote
Same, my first thought as usual is pareidolia. But, the details are so distinct.
Double exposure or someone just messing around while they were taking the picture seems most likely.
Or, ya know...a ghost.
Heydawgg t1_j2f4s9s wrote
Sibling things
AnonEMoussie t1_j2f6uzt wrote
No, this is Patrick.
Lost_Way7698 t1_j2f8inp wrote
This is a lot like village of the damned
[deleted] t1_j2f9a5p wrote
[removed]
ttaway420 t1_j2f9tak wrote
Thats just Morgan treeman
Climinteedus t1_j2fa6md wrote
VeryStonedEwok t1_j2fbn97 wrote
Why isn't it in your post history then?
wendywams t1_j2fc6zf wrote
Yes, fifth, 🙃😁
jeharris25 t1_j2fcabz wrote
That's what caught my attention when I looked at this. Why does the shortest kid have dark legs and hands? I was trying to look for whiteface or something. Especially since the word "bro" was in the title, which was a "black thing" where I grew up.
I had no idea that's not what I was supposed to be looking for in this photo.
[deleted] t1_j2fci46 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2fdcit wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2fdk73 wrote
[deleted]
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2fdy2u wrote
He was 4th of 9 kids and he was Grandma’s favorite, lol, but, yeah, they were dirt poor Okies in the 20s and they all shared those shoes.
The youngest in this photo was born in 1928 or 29
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2fe6yz wrote
The older 3 boys were in one bed and he slept in a dresser drawer til his sister was born. He ended up being huge and eventually had to sleep in the barn cause their house only had room for 3ish beds.
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2fehsk wrote
I have stared at the original of this photo for hours and that’s what I can’t make out. Could someone be kneeling further back? Where’s the top of their head?
NhylX t1_j2fgxg4 wrote
Well, TIL.
whitestguyuknow t1_j2fhohu wrote
It really looks like it's just someone in the bushes
whitestguyuknow t1_j2fi1rb wrote
Why sit here and lie just to try to convince people ghosts exist? Lower IQ comment than your upvote score
pf30146788e t1_j2fk8bm wrote
Reminds me of homer disappearing into the bushes
Vegasguy3124 t1_j2flrl1 wrote
Interesting. Do you know if this photo was an original or recycled?
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2fml7q wrote
My grandma had an original on her dresser. I got this digital copy from one of my moms cousins whose dad is in the picture. I don’t know if she scanned an original or if someone sent it to her digitally
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2fmx6z wrote
Oh, I think I understand what you are asking. Like was it reprinted on something? I think there were multiple prints made from a single negative. This scan looks exactly like my Grandma’s hard copy. I can’t recall if I have seen another hard copy. I think at my Aunt’s house?
So I think any issue would be with the negative itself
Vegasguy3124 t1_j2fnbmk wrote
I can’t help but wonder where all these gentlemen are now. It’s fascinating. Thanks for posting.
EH042 t1_j2fnuf6 wrote
Did your family’s cam had a writing on it? Something like “Camera Obscura”?
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2fob72 wrote
They’re all dead. The Curly haired one died in his teens in a plane crash while on leave from the war. The oldest two grew into kind and gentle men. The youngest was a wild card. He we served in Korea. He was funny and rough and kind and taught me how to play cards and garden. He had no teeth and only wore striped bibbed overalls. He had a skunk as a pet. He passed in the early 2000s after reuniting with an old lover (like Biblically) and I am so happy for him to have gone that way.
Edit: a word
[deleted] t1_j2fobz1 wrote
[removed]
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2fohgx wrote
No idea about the camera. My grandma just had the photo. They were dirt poor Okies. Probably wasn’t even their camera
PMmeRacoonPix t1_j2fop5s wrote
Idk that it’s a ghost. I think it’s most likely a trick of the light in leaves. Our brains are wired to see faces
golden_retrieverdog t1_j2fs7m7 wrote
why have i never heard this debunk before?
Ondexb t1_j2fwc4d wrote
neither do I
thered90 t1_j2fwtep wrote
How come I don’t see it on your profile? Or am I blind?
TomTom101_ t1_j2dy2ha wrote
I really don't like that