Submitted by _Hack_The_Planet_ t3_10p6m8o in boston
RoaminRonin13 t1_j6l9mxq wrote
Reply to comment by willzyx01 in Maura Healey wants to solve the state’s housing crisis. Here’s step one. by _Hack_The_Planet_
I think this oversimplifies it and buys into the “zoning is the problem” narrative. We could just push for rezoning that allowed for and encourages 5 story residential buildings. Those low-rise developments are going to be the main thing that brings us towards solving this problem, as they can be built slightly more affordably and make an easier argument to sell against NIMBYism.
All I’m saying is we could create the space for these buildings in our zoning, which are more easily defensible, rather than simply give up the ghost and let developers build whatever they want. “The Market” isn’t going to solve this problem, it’s perfectly fine with how expensive housing is.
You’re not wrong about the shadows thing - them fighting that project over by the Fens because it’ll cast shadows on the park at 7:30am in March or whatever is a disgrace.
Codspear t1_j6md0j6 wrote
> “The Market” isn’t going to solve this problem, it’s perfectly fine with how expensive housing is.
The market is why Houston is cheap. It doesn’t have the senseless idiocy of zoning laws.
taudep t1_j6mv6u7 wrote
>Add a quarter of a mil to that to get within a commuting distance of Boston that isn't going to make you regret your life decisions.
Houston also has nearly endless "free" land surrounding it and a population density of 3800 per mile, vs 14K - 15K for Boston. So on that note, Boston's already succeeding at nearly 3.5 - 4x the density of cramming people in?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments