Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Maxpowr9 t1_iydoh3g wrote

Seriously. 8 years is a fucking joke. It should be at most half this. Skyscrapers don't even take as long to build.

6

Master_Dogs t1_iydscfx wrote

And that's also 8 years in MBTA time. Really more like 15 years because we'll take 4 years to plan this, 3 years to fund it, another year of community meetings and then we'll take another 8 years to actually build it because we'll mismanage the entire thing. And we'll probably end up fucking it up the first time too.

13

SEND-YOUR-PII t1_iydxhg4 wrote

Skyscrapers are far more simple than a tunnel/most infrastructure projects. A skyscraper is some pipes in the ground and a big stick of concrete up into the air with some steel beams coming off the side to hold the floor up.

A tunnel is the logistics of tons and tons of skyscrapers next to each other (not counting station structures) that need to avoid utilities installed in the 1800s, avoid causing settlement of nearby buildings while making a hole under them, and can’t cause any disturbance to the roads above. Going from basically nothing to a year or two of alternative analysis, two years of design, and four years of construction is hasty.

Keep in mind the economies of scale thing, we don’t have a big metro design industry, we need to mobilize/purchase all sorts of specialized equipment, etc, all for a short project.

9

HurdieBirdie t1_iyeb6t3 wrote

It's also dependent on working around MGHs schedule of rebuilding on top of there at the same time.

1