Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_iyanbup wrote

Your post appears to be one of a number of commonly asked questions about the port city of Boston. Please check the sidebar for visitor information. Also, consider using the search function to see if this question or something similar has been asked on /r/boston in the past. It is best to do some research before posting tourism questions here, as posts are more likely to succeed if they include details such as your interests, which area you are staying in, and more specific questions. Please enjoy this map that we made just for you

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

sorayanelle t1_iyanp7a wrote

I just stayed in both the past month for work trips, and I prefer staying in Back Bay and then driving over to Seaport for dinner!

4

Peeeculiar t1_iyantpd wrote

I'd probably lean more toward Back Bay, as there's more "stuff" to walk to and it's just a cool area to walk around. Seaport is nice but may be a bit sterile for some folks (and you've probably seen some of the restaurants in the airport on the way here.)

40

man2010 t1_iyapiju wrote

Both have plenty of walkable shops/bars/restaurants, but Back Bay is better connected to the rest of the city and has better stuff within walking distance imo

15

jonoli22 t1_iyar8q2 wrote

Back Bay feels more like Boston. Seaport feels more generic and like it could be anywhere.

54

cocksure_incambridge t1_iyat0it wrote

really depends on what your mom is into. Back Bay is theoretically more Boston'ish, on the T, and walking distance to a lot of historical stuff. Seaport is like a mix of hip & Vegas-lite vibes, but is kinda stand alone and not very historic since it's all brand new

1

snorkeling_moose t1_iyaupcg wrote

Back Bay a million times over. Both in terms of accessibility and quality of restaurants, architecture, etc. Seaport is kind of a cookie-cutter Big City Neighborhood^TM, and doesn't offer much that you couldn't get literally anywhere else in a major US city. For better or worse, it's also very much where the Instagram type of crowd hangs out.

12

willzyx01 t1_iyayl5j wrote

Back Bay. It’s cool to walk around Seaport once, but it’s pretty small and you’ll run out off things to see in less than a day.

Back Bay is just pure Boston. So much shit to see and do.

10

SpindriftRascal t1_iyb7okt wrote

This isn’t a tough call. Back Bay by miles. Skip the Seaport except for the ICA and maybe the federal courthouse.

6

No_Needleworker2777 t1_iybm6e3 wrote

Definitely Back Bay. The Seaport is just a big mall with zero diversity.

5

Investing1004 t1_iybmzhx wrote

You’ll get a much clearer idea of Boston by staying in Back Bay, and you’ll be way more connected to the rest of the city.

The Seaport has the pro that almost everything is either completely renovated or brand new.

2

nebirah t1_iyd3sql wrote

The Seaport is a gentrified parking lot.

You want to stay in the Back Bay, Kenmore Square, or even north of the river in Harvard Square.

1

[deleted] t1_iydo7j4 wrote

Back Bay easy. Better food, better atmosphere, more connected to the rest of the city. You stay in the seaport of you’ve got meetings in the area, you’re heading to the cruise ship terminal in the morning, or maybe just for a water view during the summer.

1

Russiasucks_6969 t1_iyebozb wrote

Back Bay, seaport has no identity other than glass buildings and botox.

1

waffles2go2 t1_iyebw39 wrote

Oof - seaport is "can't get there from here" and only for conventions and rotating high-tech companies to torture their commuters.

Love the mexican place there with the Skulls but other than that, it is not like Boston at all....

1