Submitted by ToadScoper t3_125s8xm in boston
ToadScoper OP t1_je5u6up wrote
Reply to comment by senatorium in Transit experts say new MBTA general manager will 'fail' without more resources by ToadScoper
Precisely- the 2021 control board was set for failure by Baker himself. He ordered the current board to be as hands-off and passive as possible to lower capital costs, and he got exactly that. Unfortunately, our current governor does not recognize this issue and has made no indication of appointing a new board.
Suddenly_Suitable t1_je6inp8 wrote
How is this misinformation upvoted? Baker didn't order anything like that.
The FMCB was proposed by Baker in 2015 and is the board structure the state supported.
The legislature allowed the board to expire in 2021 and replaced it with appointees they chose, overriding Baker's proposal.
The expiration of the FMCB coincided with the pandemic and disastrous decay in MBTA operations over the last two years.
Also, capital spending increased massively during the past administration - it was not cut, rather more than doubled. The critique is actually that the T has focused too much on capital expansion at the expense of operations recently.
https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2021/06/30/mbta-fmcb-rip/
CitationNeededBadly t1_jebfenj wrote
Your article states that 5 of the 7 on the board of directors were appointed by the governor, not the legislature. The MBTA board of directors web page also says this. https://www.mbta.com/leadership/mbta-board-directors
The other 2 are the secretary of transportation, and one chosen by the cities and towns in the MBTA advisory board.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments