rip_wallace t1_j9zbkak wrote
Reply to comment by silocren in Dispatcher availability no longer all that’s holding back MBTA service by eigiarce
It’s a reading comprehension error on your end. It’s 21 permanent dispatchers, ANOTHER 5 on loan (which makes it 26) and another 3 in training.
But take your upvotes for shitting on the T with a false claim, I guess.
Edit: Here is the MBTA’s presentation disproving your bullshit lie. https://cdn.mbta.com/sites/default/files/2023-02/2023-02-24-1-report-from-the-general-manager.pdf
silocren t1_j9zniai wrote
Cool, so we should be back to a regular schedule, right? I mean it has been over a year.
Oh we're not? And we won't be until July 2024, per the MBTA's own dashboard?
https://cdn.mbta.com/sites/default/files/2023-02/2023-02-01_sd22-6_cap6_redacted.pdf
Sorry for not giving the MBTA the benefit of the doubt, they definitely deserve it after the stellar service they've provided - a train hasn't caught fire in months! Running reduced service for only 3 years should be celebrated!
rip_wallace t1_j9znw45 wrote
Lol you got caught spewing a bullshit lie and now you’re changing the subject
silocren t1_j9zoit2 wrote
Relax dude - I referenced the exact source, which made it sound like the 5 dispatchers "on loan" were part of the 21 total, with 3 "additional" dispatchers in training. Blame the reporter for being ambiguous.
It doesn't matter if they have 5 dispatchers or 50 if they can't run a normal schedule for 3+ years. The number is irrelevant.
Imagine simping for the MBTA in 2023.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments