Submitted by schmendimini t3_11cz3yn in boston
Comments
RailRoad_Candy t1_ja62goa wrote
Its as art should be enjoyed, in the dark, with bad lighting.
septagon t1_ja6idvl wrote
From a very specific angle...
faljav t1_ja6oyl0 wrote
Apparently my dating habits in college were "art"
chehov t1_ja7k1e6 wrote
with eyes closed
OptimalFlight101 t1_ja7hj8x wrote
The penis angle?
Rindan t1_ja6iocq wrote
Stop trying to make it happen.
It looks like someone holding either a massive turd, or a giant dildo. It looks that way because of the back of the arms don't have an arm like structure, and there are "back of the arms" seen from almost every angle. This picture is slightly better than most because it has the least amount of back of arms / massive turd / giant dildo in the shot possible and it is dark.
It's not disrespecting MLKs memory to think that this statue looks like some holding a massive turd or giant dildo. You don't have to find an angle where it is least awful. Sometimes art is just awful. It's okay. I'm totally going to show out of town folks the hands holding a massive dildo statue, because it's hilarious. Sometimes art is so bad it is hilarious, and these arms that appears to be holding up a massive, floppy dong are just one such piece. Stop trying to be proud for the "right" reasons, and accept the hilarity of being proud of our arms holding aloft a giant dildo statue for the hilariously wrong reasons.
CanIShowYouMyLizardz t1_ja6mwon wrote
I call it the Lexington Steele statue.
orielbean t1_ja8ffde wrote
If you look at the photo source, the artist ignores the perfect part of the photo subjects - their happy beaming smiling faces.
Coretta and Martin both have gorgeous smiles that convey all the gravity of the moment. Whereas the hug is a bit awkward and candid…
Shufflebuzz t1_ja6pl44 wrote
Maybe it just doesn't photograph well.
Perhaps it looks better in person?
It has to, right?
It couldn't have gotten all the way from concept to giant sculpture installation without someone saying that it looks bad.
Could it?
IAmRyan2049 t1_ja6rwbc wrote
It looks great in drone photographs from above. The incredible artistic achievement is apparent from that angle.
Unfortunately no one will ever see that, and it looks like a punchline. It’s butt cheeks
ThaMac t1_ja7skd3 wrote
I’ve been there and I feel no differently after seeing it in person. From most angles it looks like two hands holding a huge turd or a huge bronze dick.
From some angles, it goes look like someone performing cunninlingus. I didn’t notice that in pictures, so there’s that I guess.
septagon t1_ja7shni wrote
It very much could have because at NO point along the way was anyone able to question it. Would YOU be the city exec to axe the mlk statue??
PrettyTogether108 t1_jacnrd2 wrote
It's not great. That's the best I can say about it.
Boston1_ t1_ja7zamf wrote
Or someone getting eaten out..
teucer_ t1_ja8u91m wrote
MLK was a serial womanizer so I tend to side with the dildo viewpoint
donkadunny t1_ja6ysaw wrote
It looks great in person. Have you actually seen it in person? Or just the photos?
michael_scarn_21 t1_ja77p5i wrote
I saw it in person for the first time on Friday and still thought it looked like hands holding a dong. It's unfortunate from most angles.
-doughboy t1_ja7kyvh wrote
I have seen it in person too after first only seeing pictures, where I thought it looked like shit. My feeling is that it will look better to everyone when the weather is sunnier, we have later sunsets, the park is greener, etc. It is not great, but it's not as awful as everyone makes it out to be.
Acadia_Due t1_ja7uw1k wrote
It looks even more penisy in person.
TheColonelRLD t1_ja7xa8j wrote
"Stop trying to make it happen"
In response to one person expressing their enjoyment of a piece of art. Get over yourself buddy. The world doesn't live by your subjective opinions. You've got a lot of growing up to do. Smh at your upvotes. Come on Boston.
TheDoktorIsIn t1_ja7y2ql wrote
I mean, yeah it's subjective but it's also a popular subjective opinion. At what out does a "great" public work of art become meaningless if the masses don't enjoy it?
The Embrace being wildly unpopular is not an uncommon opinion. It's subjective, sure, but it's the popular opinion.
radwagondesign t1_ja7emt6 wrote
I can’t believe people are still putting this much energy into hating it
Flakybeef t1_ja7rh91 wrote
I can’t believe people are still putting this much effort into convincing others it look like an actual embrace
Acadia_Due t1_ja7v905 wrote
Given how much they spent on it, the least we can do is enjoy hating it.
Rindan t1_ja9j6vq wrote
You misunderstand. I don't hate it. Bad art awesome. I like it. I literally hope we keep it forever and will be disappointed if they give into public pressure and bring it down. What other city has two massive bronze arms holding up a big flaccid schlong? That's a thing to brag about and show people. The only thing we need to do to improve it is to give it a good nick name. "Two arms holding aloft a big floppy dong" is just too long to say.
radwagondesign t1_jaahdwy wrote
real talk, did not read your first post. just saw the length of it and couldnt believe there were still that many words to be typed about it.
that said, i take absolutely no umbrage with this approach you have here. fully on board with this.
UpInTheCut t1_ja69irv wrote
You can gift wrap a shit to look like a heart, but honestly... it's still a piece of shit..
BobSacamano47 t1_ja7fbqu wrote
Guys, chill. It's obviously not finished yet. When they do the rest it's gonna be sick.
Digitaltwinn t1_ja8g5rl wrote
Embrace the temporary as permanent. It is the Boston way.
Appropriate-Grand-64 t1_ja87hb8 wrote
I love this take, Bob.😂😁🏆
FoodGuy44 t1_ja5un7l wrote
Or Tasteful Penetration…
Friendly_lumberjack t1_ja5upgc wrote
Same. I think it's great in person. I'm glad it's on the common
leupboat420smkeit t1_ja6jr6s wrote
I challenge everyone reading this who thinks it’s ugly, and yet has not seen it in person, to go take a look at it in real life. Art is suppose to be experienced outside of a phone screen.
jack-o-licious t1_ja7iicm wrote
> Art is suppose to be
Don't confuse "art" (which isn't "supposed" to be anything) with "public art" which is supposed to improve the area around it. As public art, this is not good. The Common was better without it.
man2010 t1_ja7pwja wrote
I think the Common is better with this sculpture than with the half dead patch of grass it replaced
psychicsword t1_ja7r5vr wrote
I did see it in person. It looked like a giant dong. There are better sides of it where it looks less like a giant dong but that doesn't change the fact that it looks like one from most angles.
ThaMac t1_ja7spqm wrote
I’ve seen it irl multiple times and if anything it just reaffirmed by belief that it looks like two arms holding up a bronze cock, from most angles.
rubicon83 t1_ja7mvlv wrote
I have seen it more than once in pers. Its ridiculously bad in person as well.
COVID_2019 t1_ja7o6mq wrote
Have seen it irl. It looks good from one angle, looks weird from every other angle.
Mattyi t1_ja7a5q8 wrote
Saw it in person a few weeks ago as well and really enjoyed it, especially up close.
HellsAttack t1_ja7omq1 wrote
Like at the molecular level
Mishmoo t1_ja6m3pv wrote
From certain angles, raw sewage looks like chocolate mousse.
EZ-PZ-Japa-NEE-Z t1_ja6l50d wrote
Stop. It’s ugly from every angle.
-Slan- t1_ja66a4n wrote
a heart made out of a giant turd
danmur15 t1_ja7io0e wrote
I saw it in person for the first time recently and tbh it looks fine from the ground. Seeing it from a higher angle with those drone shots really didn't do it justice.
It was also super cool being able to walk under the statue so it was as if you were in the embrace too.
[deleted] t1_ja8b0so wrote
[deleted]
IAmRyan2049 t1_ja6r5xp wrote
I was finally able to see it in person last week. I thought it would make more sense in person. It didn’t.
In person it’s huge!
MurdrWeaponRocketBra t1_ja6s164 wrote
It's got a few good angles. It also has a few angles of body horror where it invokes the sense of amputated limbs. And one angle where it looks like hands holding a giant dick.
Sculpture is meant to be seen from all angles. If a piece of 3D art fails at half its perspectives, it's not a good work.
MarquisJames t1_ja6sbej wrote
Yeah I mean that’s the angle they should’ve showed it to everyone first. It’s definitely supposed to be a heart. Also it’s idiotic that people think you can’t enjoy art in the dark. It’s a sculpture not the fucking Mona Lisa
DontStealMyPen1 t1_ja6o4rg wrote
Everything and everyone is more attractive when the light's are dim. In all seriousness, I saw the statue the other day and it's fine. I don't know why ppl spend so much time on their computers commenting on the ugliness of the statue. Oh wait, I do know. Those people suck and have no lives. Mystery solved.
temp4adhd t1_ja6o1qn wrote
Sometimes my poop also looks like a heart
BUT SERIOUSLY
At some angles to me it looks like Coretta is totally holding up her man, and I love that angle.
Buk303 t1_ja7ydia wrote
Still looks like when I take a shit and hits the toilet water….
MarimbaMan07 t1_ja7jqqw wrote
Looks like a poo pretzel my dog would leave in the ground
jessep34 t1_ja7kylr wrote
I don’t see why people hate it at any angle to be honest. Is it my favorite piece of art? No at all. But, for a public park, you want something that’s not too bold because people’s taste in art varies so much and you want to aim for it to be acceptable to most. I’m still confused why it’s not. It fits right in with public park art, in my opinion.
Zealousideal-Top4576 t1_ja8dufw wrote
So everyone thinks they are"the one" to show the perfect angle that this monstrosity looks good. But wait you haven't seen it from this angle.
reveazure t1_ja69s7r wrote
The abundance of hearts in cultural iconography seems to be growing in inverse proportion to the amount of fucks anyone actually has to give about anyone else.
odeacon t1_ja7gd86 wrote
It’s beautiful at some angels , and atrociously ugly at others
bluebellsing t1_ja7hsbh wrote
True friend but the texture isn't giving
jules13131382 t1_ja8db3i wrote
I think the statue is odd but I applaud the effort
Digitaltwinn t1_ja8gdtn wrote
Sometimes my dog's turds are in the shape of a heart, too!
Conscious_Ad_4733 t1_ja8j4ng wrote
Looks like a running back holding a football
Bmhayes11 t1_ja8qwal wrote
heart shaped turd
redheaded_stepc t1_ja95sx2 wrote
The lighting really makes the veins pop
Juancho511 t1_ja9lnym wrote
A dick heart.
cspank523 t1_ja9zk1g wrote
From that angle it looks like a heart which is nice. Problem is there's another angle where it looks like a dick.
Previous_Tie8561 t1_jaagdap wrote
Looks like eating *** if you’re coming from the Boylston side
Firebolt_514 t1_jabk8km wrote
Glittering_Quail7589 t1_ja7kfl9 wrote
Lol, posted to this subreddit by the city officials who should be ashamed.
[deleted] t1_ja6jj2m wrote
[deleted]
jonoli22 t1_ja64yhk wrote
I am also more attractive in the dark.