Submitted by swedish_librarian t3_10p6ydb in books
ohboop t1_j6jhzj6 wrote
Reply to comment by ArmadilloFour in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
>you really cannot expect all of society to just stop discussing pretty widely disseminated stories just because you haven't gotten there yet.
I didn't mention all of society in my comment, so I'm not sure how they all got involved here? I don't enjoy being spoiled in conversation with other individuals, and I also don't like it when people "defend" their spoiling me just because the story is old...I never said I expected anything of anyone, rather stated my preference for not being spoiled, and frustration at people dismissing my feelings about it just because a book is old.
ArmadilloFour t1_j6jj4qr wrote
So wait, are you just talking about having one-on-one convos about The Age of Innocence (or whatever) and having the person you're talking to be the one to go, "Boy wait until you get to the part where..."?
Because if so then yeah, that's a pretty shitty move. I thought you were just broadly complaining about the general statute of limitations for spoiling classic literature.
ohboop t1_j6jldb0 wrote
Yep! I've got pretty good habits for avoiding spoilers "in the wild", my biggest source of spoilers come from people casually mentioning the big twist. My least favorite is when I try to stop people, and they insist on finishing their thought anyways because it's "not a spoiler" in their opinion.
It's hard to convey tone over the internet, but this isn't that big of a deal to me. Even if my friends spoil me, I don't hold on to a grudge or anything, it's more of a funny "how could you" moment.
Misternogo t1_j6kskv9 wrote
They're dismissing your feelings because you're being unreasonable.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments