Submitted by swedish_librarian t3_10p6ydb in books
icarusrising9 t1_j6jcc69 wrote
Reply to comment by Marcuse0 in The 10 Inalienable Rights of the Reader by swedish_librarian
"...rights are limited freedoms which are supposed to be guaranteed by governments"? I mean, I think Englightenment-era thinkers certainly didn't talk about rights in this way, nor does the US Constitution. Nevermind more recent stuff, like Roosevelt's "second bill of rights".
Amzuja t1_j6jlf1x wrote
They’re correct though. I can’t think of any rights that a government guarantees and/or can’t overrule. We don’t, as a species, have any inherent universal rights. They’re man made ideas, which evolve with time and are changeable as morals change
icarusrising9 t1_j6jqsaz wrote
You're contradicting what they said, and talking about stuff outside the context of Rights Theory. I just meant to point out that rights as "limited freedoms [...] guaranteed by governments" is sort of silly, since the whole point of rights are to push back on perceived violation of those rights.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments