Submitted by ricarleite2 t3_10m715v in books
ricarleite2 OP t1_j62wwy7 wrote
Reply to comment by Amayeoldnow in "Hounds of Baskervilles" question [Spoilers] by ricarleite2
Ar the epilogue Holmes is asked about Stapleton being an obvious culprit regardless of the dog due to him living under a false name nearby, and Holmes pretty much answers "Yeah well oopsie, who knows?".
Amayeoldnow t1_j62x69z wrote
Stapleton also thought he was superior to EVERYONE and especially all the local yokels. I really don’t think he thought he would be found out and if he was he wouldn’t be convicted. The dude was nuts and made me suspicious of anyone who catches butterflies. “Butterfly net? Yeah sure. Bet you have a starved hellhound hidden somewhere.” 🤣
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments