Submitted by angelojann t3_10nigaq in books
BladeDoc t1_j6datpm wrote
Reply to comment by Yrcrazypa in Dickens' David Copperfield: Were men more affectionate with each other in the 18th century? by angelojann
This is the “is/ought” fallacy. Someone describing a situation does not mean that they think the situation is good. To be specific it is quite possible to think that the decline of non-sexual same-sex public intimacy was an unfortunate side effect of the otherwise beneficial rise of homosexual relationship acceptance.
Hopefully, if homosexual relationships are completely destigmatized this process will slowly reverse as people will not care if they are classified as being “gay“.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments