Submitted by angelojann t3_10nigaq in books
angelojann OP t1_j6b65kk wrote
Reply to comment by unclefipps in Dickens' David Copperfield: Were men more affectionate with each other in the 18th century? by angelojann
On top of this, I've noticed that men were not obsessed with sports during that time but more in arts, literature, and culture.
LaunchTransient t1_j6cqnc5 wrote
Heavy involvement in sports was very much a thing in the Victorian era, it was viewed as healthy and good for the mind (which, surprisingly compared with many Victorian beliefs on other medical issues, is actually correct.)
The thing is that in that era it was a much more local, amateur scene - professional sports weren't really a thing yet.
Another point I should make though is that Victorian society was heavily stratified. Do not assume that what is normal for the upper classes translates to the behaviour of the lower classes. Not everyone saw an education as being worthwhile, many thought their children should focus on practical matters of making enough to put food on the table and a roof over their heads.
angelojann OP t1_j6cqpbp wrote
thank you for the explanation!!
unclefipps t1_j6biwr4 wrote
While I recognize the sports industry does create some jobs, I think the modern obsession with sports is really over-the-top. Colleges focus on it because they make a ton of money from it. The professional players get paid unreasonably huge amounts of money to play a game, and then the fans are obsessed with it like it's a religion.
angelojann OP t1_j6bjhmo wrote
I agree with this too.. However in our country, if you don't play basketball,.people will think you're gay.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments