Submitted by Potential_Crisis t3_zusnhj in books
tallandazn t1_j1l8lxe wrote
i think the social media has also shaped how we interact with other forms of media. considering we can access lots more information now than ever before there's a need for everything to be instantenous. i notice pretty terrible characterization in anything YA (haven't thought about new books vs. old books) myself. that being said I wouldn't go as far as to say our quality of writing has decreased or anything but i do notice there's a lot more options to sift through these days and loads of them are pretty mediocre. more power to writers though :)
pretenditscherrylube t1_j1m6sdp wrote
Lots of books 50 years ago were mediocre. We just don’t read them anymore
oniontomatocrouton t1_j1mem01 wrote
Also true.
tallandazn t1_j1n2j9b wrote
oh yeah, time does the sifting for us on that regard
pretenditscherrylube t1_j1n40ny wrote
I have no problem reading contemporary books, even though quality isn’t as easily discernible. It’s because I love the process of discovering if a book will be good or bad. When I read a classic, there isn’t the same process of discovery as it is with a new novel. It’s more searching about why that book is good, but I really prefer the wider range of reading experiences, where I can decide if a book is good or bad or overrated or misunderstood. I also like books with modern morals.
Potential_Crisis OP t1_j1nu8i4 wrote
yeah, this is what I was thinking. Any old books I read now have survived this long only because they are well written, so poorly paced new books haven't had enough time to be weeded out.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments