Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Marril96 t1_iy86t4d wrote

Reply to comment by AccomplishedBasil700 in Is Elinor Lipman a tad antifeminist? by WantToBelieveInMagic

No, it's not different. It's fiction. Not real. Make believe.

By your logic my friend must be a rapist because she's got a rape kink and likes to read books and fanfiction where that contains it. It's complete nonsense.

If somebody writes a work of fiction, and you can't tell that apart from reality, that is a you issue. Not an author issue, or a publisher issue. A you issue. What you believe in and what you decide to act on are your personal responsibility, not the responsibility of the creator who made a fictional work.

−3

AccomplishedBasil700 t1_iy8a5fn wrote

No, I explicitly said "Writing about an action doesn’t mean you’ve committed that action, of course." So your friend is not a rapist just because she has a rape kink.

Do you think fiction has persuasive power? I mean, do you think that maybe there could be a discourse surrounding a certain topic, and that discourse contains things that are wrong, morally and/or factually? I do. I think that's a huge problem, in fact, with both television, books, news media, and whatever else.

Here's an example. Suppose all those forms of media have a common rhetorical angle that suggests that white people in the USA are the subjects of an ongoing genocide. That pervasive rhetorical angle in various forms of media is sure to influence some (white Americans') belief that they are in fact suffering from an ongoing genocide. This angle can be expressed in fiction, film, online communities, political speeches, news, and anywhere else where there is language.

I think you are right that it is a "you problem," i.e. a problem with the audience. But it's also a creator's problem and a publisher's problem because the author and publisher are also audiences of other expressions of that discourse.

2