Submitted by razorh00f t3_xtebta in books

What exactly did he mean by that, and why was he so adamant about that terminology?

I understand what the word supposition means in and of itself but I’m a little unclear on why he was so keen to differentiate between the two and why he would have such qualms about people referring to it as an allegory, a conclusion I really can’t say is a difficult one to arrive at.

4

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

There's nothing here…