Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ExistentialReckning t1_iuc0tri wrote

I'm not a natural reader. I didn't read a book cover to cover until my mid 20s (yes I just lied my way through every book report and reading assignment through school). I read (non-fiction only) for about 2 years during my lunch breaks only because I worked out of town. This was in the pre-smartphones days.

I started reading again about 4 years ago as a mid-life crisis. With the political atmosphere in America, pundits and media were making references such as the "Orwellian times" we were living in, and I didn't get the references because I'd never read the books. I felt at my age I should be more aware, engaged and "cultured", so I started reading those books. My interest waned for about 6 months during that time, but otherwise I've been fairly avidly reading.

So, for me, given my overall lack of natural interest in reading anf historical lack of doing so, I do view each book as an accomplishment. I do look at the bookmark marching through the book with a sense of achievement. I just started using Goodreads this year to track every book I read, and I look forward to logging the accomplishment each time I finish a book.

2

failurescape t1_iucd6u0 wrote

In fairness, I somewhat doubt some of these pundits understand what they're alluding to with "Orwellian" either.

2

ExistentialReckning t1_iud523a wrote

I read an article once where the headline was something like "Lord of the Flies Plays Out Inside Trump's Inner Circle" and then what the author went on to describe was nothing like Lord of the Flies.

But, had I not read Lord of the Flies, I wouldn't have known that. So in the moment I felt like my purpose was achieved.

2