Submitted by felix_using_reddit t3_123ekej in books
felix_using_reddit OP t1_jdukbbd wrote
Reply to comment by GumGuts in How do I find out who knows what they are talking about? by felix_using_reddit
Yeah being dumb sadly is nothing that a PhD makes disappear there are some really delusional people in academia as well I remember a story about a guy (PhD in biology) that claimed viruses don’t exist. Basically he said that he‘ll give anyone that can prove the existence of viruses to him $1,000 someone then linked him 6 peer-reviewed articles that do just that and after he (suprise!!) refused to give out the money the other guy took it to court and the dr. was forced to give out the reward. Lol Anyway such stories are funny but I don’t think I‘m at serious risk of falling prey to some strange people suggesting delusional conspiracies antivaxx or whatever else.. I trust myself to be able to see through that
GumGuts t1_jdukru3 wrote
Hah, yeah, I think I've heard of him. One of those Terrain Model folk. It's a mad, mad world.
I don't mean to dissuade you from thinking there isn't a consensus on many things. Like the mood stabilizers and antipsychotics, there are things that are prevalent in many disciplines.
The books these are in may not be as glamorous as the shiny, edgy books with bold claims. One way is to find out what they're talking about: how does a psychotherapist help a patient? What's the day in the life of a nutritionist? When doctors do talk about vaccines, what do they say? How do Olympic athletes train?
Getting a sense of something may be just as, if not more, important than factual knowledge.
Like I said, think of it as exploring, not fact-checking.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments