Submitted by felix_using_reddit t3_123ekej in books
SilverChances t1_jdueyp3 wrote
Rankings and ratings are a less reliable metric because unfortunately they can be manipulated and there is often strong commercial incentive to do so.
The easiest way is to find someone who is a trusted authority in the subject area and get them to give you a bibliography that is suited to your level of knowledge. (You don't necessarily need personal access; they may have a blog or have posted online course syllabi, etc.) To identify an expert, look for traditional credentials, like publications in peer-reviewed journals and tenured positions at respected universities. This sort of structure is a lot more reliable than star ratings on online platforms.
A librarian at a good library can also be a really a good resource. If there are any universities in your area you can inquire whether you are allowed to use their library.
camplate t1_jdvgg72 wrote
Years ago while walking through the stacks at Uni I stumbled upon a large book that listed references to genetic research, evolution, and any questions that tried to rebuff settled science. Sad that such a book even needed created.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments