Submitted by falling_fire t3_1262pkf in books
I started reading A.C. Doyle and Agatha Christie at 12, (which was probably too young, but c'est la vie lol.) I fell in love with mysteries written between 1880-1945. A large range, I know, but variety is the spice of life :). I've read all of R.A. Freeman's Thorndyke books and G.K. Chesterton's Father Brown stories. All this is to say is that I've done my time in the genre lol.
I ran into Ngaio Marsh's books on r/agathachristie where people were saying taking issue with the marketing phrase: "It’s time to start comparing Christie to Marsh instead of the other way around.” I had nothing to read so I started with the first of her books.
Y'all. They are so good! The characters are fun and realistic, the plots are interesting, and the descriptive passages are soooo great. The slang in the first books is a little hard for this American to understand, but I got used to it pretty quick. The little references to contemporary crime authors make me smile everytime.
Is it equal with Agatha Christie? Let's be real — Agatha Christie has such a distinctive style that if she's your pinnacle of writing, nothing will ever compare. (When Christie's good, she's very, very good but when she's off her game, it's bonkers.) Comparing other writers to Agatha Christie is a pretty bad way to sell things IMO, because her swarms of loyal readers will be disappointed.
But Ngaio Marsh is good. She's definitely inspired by Christie, but she moved past it into her own style that is so delightful. You go girl, recognize your influences and use them to improve!
I'm 10 books in and I'm so excited to keep going!
Monsieur_Moneybags t1_je7o5xp wrote
Of the "Big Four"—Agatha Christie, Dorothy Sayers, Ngaio Marsh, Margery Allingham—I think Marsh is the best overall writer. Christie's plots often relied on some absurdities and her characters weren't all that well-developed. That doesn't mean Christie was a bad writer, just that she wasn't as good as Marsh.