Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_j3werxz wrote

Hello there!

Links from the domain present in your post are known to present a soft paywall to users. As a result, some users may have difficulty reading the linked content.

It may be helpful to provide a comment containing a synopsis or a snippet of the major points of the article in order to help those who may not be able to see it.

In accordance with the subreddit rules, please do not post the entirety of the article's contents as a comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

z3mcs OP t1_j3wfbif wrote

>Baltimore Banner: What are the takeaways from the first months of data collection from the I-83 cameras?

>BCDOT : We are seeing evidence of slower speeds on I-83. Below is the breakdown of the total 153,251 citations issued:

>Northbound I-83, W 41st St.: 70,933

>Southbound I-83, W 41st St.: 82,318

>During the 90-day warning phase, 202,071, warnings were issued. During the first 90 days of live citations, 109,851 warnings were issued, indicating that the effects trickled down. This corresponds to a 54.3% drop in warnings and citations issued since the program’s implementation.

>Meanwhile, the average issued warning/citation speed has dropped from 65.9 mph to 65.3 mph, indicating that motorists are slowing down. Official crash data for the corridor will not be available until summer 2023 when it is submitted to city DOT by the Maryland Highway Safety Office.

65.9 to 65.3 is.... weak. Good info in this article though. And there are two reader questions that are answered.

11

megalomike t1_j3wgdxh wrote

when they first turned on the difference was noticeable. it's still better than it was a year ago but you do see people trying to weave at 80 again. the crash data will be interesting.

42

atomlinson89 t1_j3wgpit wrote

I mean i applaud them, but they need to be all along 83 to do anything. What I see more than anything is everyone slamming on their brakes causing backups as they approach the cameras and then speeding off after they pass them.

32

DONNIENARC0 t1_j3wl04o wrote

Yeah. I commute 83 daily and still haven't seen a bad wreck around the Northern Parkway bend since they installed these whereas it felt like it used to happen every other week or so in the past. It really felt like you could expect atleast one accident there every time there was a decent bit of inclement weather in that area.

The biggest difference for me anecdotally seems to be that most people just don't weave 80 around that bend anymore, and the ones that try to largely can't because all lanes generally slow to ~55 because of people dodging the cameras. Even if they're successful in going 80 around there for a week or something, I'd bet they'd stop pretty quick after getting pelted with a barrage of $40 tickets.

E: on a slightly unrelated note, I think this is the first time I've seen them actually acknowledge that they can't pull people over even if they wanted to because of the lack of road shoulders...

> BCDOT: Traditional methods of speed enforcement are not possible on I-83 within Baltimore City due to the existing width of roadway shoulders, fiscal and engineering constraints, and resource challenges.

25

Ghant_ t1_j3wt581 wrote

109,851 tickets at $40 a pop adds up to $4,394,040 in 90 days.*
Does this money go to the city or the police department? I assume the company that maintains the cameras gets a solid portion of the profits too

Edit:ticket price change

6

DONNIENARC0 t1_j3wuhj3 wrote

> the legislation for the I-83 speed camera program requires that all revenues be directed toward the cost of operating the camera program on I-83 and I-83 roadway safety improvements within Baltimore City.

10

sxswnxnw t1_j3wz91u wrote

It's much better driving on this roadway now, imo.

Perhaps with some of the money they will add additional cameras.

If the state police want some easy money they should find a place to squat just across the Baltimore City line by the Baltimore sign. Because people take off for 695 at that point. 🤣

7

mrd49 t1_j3x1z57 wrote

I would like to know why they put up infrastructure for 6 cameras but we are now only using 2 of them. I remember that The Sun said that there would be 6 installed but only 2 active at once. Does anyone know if that is still the plan?

19

SaveFailsafe t1_j3x3i68 wrote

They need a camera at every entrance/exit that timestamps your plate and calculates your average speed when you exit. If average speed greater than speed limit then you get ticket. Too many people just slam on the brakes for the camera and then go right back to 80mph.

−12

No_Spin_Zone360 t1_j3x69qt wrote

If there's no stats on accidents, injuries, and fatalities, then it's nothing more than a revenue stream.

−2

engin__r t1_j3x6vsv wrote

Does anyone know why the speed limit going north from downtown is lower than going south into downtown? The roads feel pretty similar to me, but one is set at 40 and the other at 50.

5

EthanSayfo t1_j3xapzu wrote

Yeah, but that's the speed drop for people who are issued warnings or citations, not everyone driving by. Quite obviously, average speeds have slowed down considerably where the cameras are installed.

7

The_Waxies_Dargle t1_j3xdr3v wrote

> I've seen them actually acknowledge that they can't pull people over even if they wanted to because of the lack of road shoulders...

I had a cop light me up on 83. I was between Cold Spring and Northern and so I went to Northern, exited 83 and pulled over where there was a nice big shoulder. Cop went ballistic on me accusing me of ignoring him.

I got off with a warning. So maybe he recognized I was looking out for his well being.

16

Velghast t1_j3xhu3c wrote

People just avoid speeding in front of the cameras now there's always a slowdown where the camera is and then as soon as people are past the camera it's right back to 80 mph and weaving out of traffic.

5

bmore t1_j3xuudr wrote

County legislators who argue local control all day love to prevent Baltimore from having the same authority because they're hypocrites who speed to their downtown law firms.

8

5wiresam t1_j3y0nr3 wrote

I can see the stretch of 83 by Union/Woodberry from my house. Used to see/hear accidents multiple times a day on that really bad stretch of road. From what I can tell there has been an incredible decline in accidents that started as soon as that camera came online, and such accidents are now unusual rather than nearly constant.

My only complaint is that the flash isn't aimed -at all-, and I get strobe lights through my bedroom window with every ticket almost 1/2 mile from the camera. How hard can it be to put some hoods on those things?

14

temptags t1_j40wb1k wrote

Can you please have all of those damaged attenuators and crash cushions along I-83 replaced? Seems like every single one of them is destroyed and have been for years. They no longer function and are now fixed objects that will increase the severity of a crash if they're struck.

1